The results of the survey to know the citizen opinion on the reform of the Judicial Branch of the Federation They will be announced today, as reported last week by the virtual president-elect, Claudia Sheinbaum.
Constitutional reform
As these are reforms to the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, the initiative must be approved by the qualified majority of the Congress of the Union (Chamber of Deputies and Senate of the Republic), as well as by two thirds of the congresses. premises in each entity. However, Claudia Sheinbaum announced that on Saturday, June 15 and Sunday, June 16, Morena would conduct the survey to find out what Mexicans think about the issue.
Analysis
In this sense, analysts and political columnists consider that this exercise is a “farce” and lacks legitimacy, since citizens are unaware of the issue and whatever the result of the citizen consultation, a “yes” will be reported.
“The results will not be a surprise, it will be a resounding yes, there is nothing surprising in Brunetteit is just a permission that they ask of those of us who do not agree with them destroying our country,” said Alfredo Brambila.
“It is a farce to disguise a reform that people do not even understand as popular,” said Esteban Quintero.
Analysts
IGNORANCE
“Morena found the formula to legitimize all her decisions, including those that put democracy and the division of powers at risk.”
Alexandro Mendez
Analyst
“This weekend, Brunette carried out a series of surveys to find out the opinion of citizens about the reform of the Judiciary that they are promoting. However, this is not the first time that the party has resorted to this type of consultation and despite this history, a considerable concern arises: the lack of knowledge on the issue among the population,” expressed Alexandro Méndez.
Information is missing
The EL DEBATE analyst and columnist considered that with surveys carried out by specialized companies and one by the party itself, it is essential to question the ability of citizens to make an informed judgment about such a complex reform.
Citizen ignorance could define the results of this survey, he said.
“This lack of adequate information could introduce significant bias, tilting the results towards the response the party expects. This puts at risk the validity and representativeness of the results, which will be presented by Claudia Sheinbaum on Monday. “Morena found a way to legitimize all of her decisions through citizens,” the analyst added.
THE FARCE
“The survey that Morena promotes is a farce to disguise as popular a reform that many do not even understand.”
Esteban Quintero
Analyst
For the analyst and columnist of EL DEBATE Esteban Quintero, without a doubt, the Power of attorney It is perfectible and subject to reform; However, the system of direct election of judges and magistrates “seems crazy to me, crazy,” he said.
Choice
He made it clear that judges do not reach that place because of their popularity, but rather they rise within the career service of the Judiciary due to skills and knowledge, which he also considered as a true recognition of merit.
On the other hand, he added, the survey that Brunette promotes and carried out this Saturday, June 15 and Sunday, June 16, it is “a farce” to disguise as popular a reform that many do not even understand.
“From the moment this survey was announced we know what the results will be,” added the political analyst, highlighting that, whatever the result of the citizen consultation, it will not have any validity or credibility, so, surely, it will not be object of influence for the legislators who must vote on it in the chambers.
UNPUBLISHED
“The ideal would be that, beyond the selection of judges, a profound reform of the judicial system would be proposed, including the prosecutor’s offices.”
Joaquin Miranda
Analyst
An unprecedented fact in Mexico It would be that judges and magistrates of the Judicial Branch of the Federation are elected by popular vote, as proposed by the reform promoted by President Andrés Manuel López Obrador and now also by the virtual president-elect, Claudia Sheinbaumconsidered Joaquín Miranda.
Opinion
The analyst and expert in legislative matters highlighted that this reform proposes that ministers be elected by universal vote with a mechanism of proposal from the other powers, something that, although, he said, already exists in other countries, it is not clear whether in Mexico the experiment would work.
“The doubt lies in the fact that Mexico has had problems maintaining judicial independence; Separating law from politics has been an unfinished task in Mexico, where the pressures and influences of powerful figures have intervened in the application of justice,” she added.
He added that the biggest challenge is how the popular election could reduce impunity and at the same time guarantee the independence of those who judge, the analyst questioned.
ILLEGITIMATE
“If Claudia Sheinbaum allows the approval of this law, she will show her authoritarian talent, worse than what Obrador has shown.”
Alfredo Brambila
Analyst
“The reform of the Judiciary represents a setback. It is annulling the possibility, already minimal, of the people having justice. Contrary to what they say, this new model “will allow them to decide who has justice and what kind,” said Alfredo Brambila.
In disagreement
The political analyst and columnist for EL DEBATE highlighted that the election of judges by popular vote further facilitates the interference of organized crime.
“Yeah Claudia Sheinbaum allows the approval of this law will show his authoritarian talent, worse than what Obrador has shown. “This reform could be the ruin of Mexico,” he added.
Alfredo Brambila went further by pointing out that the consultation carried out by Morena is a survey without legitimacy. “The results will not be a surprise; It will be a resounding yes. Nothing surprising in Morena that believes and claims to embody the will of the people. Their survey is the permission they ask of us citizens and the various sectors that do not agree to destroy the country,” he added to make clear the disagreement over the survey carried out.
#Claudia #Sheinbaum #reports #today #survey #reform #Judiciary