The grand final of the 2024 Clausura Tournament between Club América and Club de Fútbol Cruz Azul was decided with a solitary goal via penalty from the goalscorer and captain azulcrema, Henry MartinHowever, the controversy did not wait due to the divided opinions about the correct or incorrect marking of the penalty charge by the central judge with everything and the use of the VAR.
The former referee and analyst of ESPN, Felipe Ramos Rizo, the newspaper analyst THIS, Eduardo Brizio, as well as the also ex-whistler Marco Antonio Rodríguez They pointed out that the lack of Carlos Rotondi toward Israel Kings It did not exist, so the shot should not have been scored from eleven paces.
Don’t forget to also follow us on our Instagram account, 90min_enand our Twitter account, @90minespanol!
In the posture of Edgardo Codesal considered that there was a penalty in favor of the local team, as did Francisco Chacon, who pointed out: “I think being Anti-American covers their eyes, there is a penalty, it is not even controversial, Rotondi made a mistake, he arrived late to the play, he never touches the ball and constitutes an obstacle for Reyes. Here is the evidence”, in his X account.
At the end of the match in the mixed zone, the Argentine footballer from La Maquina gave a statement about the situation, but did not elaborate on the topic to avoid some type of sanction.
“A lot of helplessness, personally I only have to thank the fans, apologize, it is a play that cannot define a Final and that is the anger because we played a great game, thank the people and become strong,” he said.
“Impotence, I don’t want to declare more so as not to be fined, but I am very helpless, apologize and confirm that we are going to continue fighting for the tenth,” he said.
In this way, the Eagles won 2-1 on aggregate and won the two-time championship, the Champion of Champions, and added their fifteenth league trophy.
#criminal #Experts #give #opinion #Américas #controversial #goal #final