“365 days”a film based on the novel by Blanka Lipinska, was a boom in Netflix. His racy scenes raised the temperature of viewers and views on the streaming platform. After this, it was to be expected that the story would become a saga.
Despite this, the deliveries were strongly criticized for praising the Stockholm syndrome and the misogyny of which Laura Biel was a victim at the hands of Don Massimo. Not for nothing have they achieved an infamous historical record: it is already the worst movie trilogy ever made, according to Rotten Tomatoes.
In between, the films of the trilogy have 0% approval from specialized critics. The fact has surprised the fans because they did not expect such a low rating and fear that this bad reputation is a reason to cancel the fourth installment.
However, Netflix has always pushed the making of sequels despite the scandal due to huge revenue and there is no reason to believe that the platform will not do the same with the new sequel.
What did critics say about “365 days”?
The premiere of “365 days” on Netflix was as successful as it was controversial due to its misogynistic content, poor drama and little cinematographic contribution. Below, we share critical appraisals that did not hesitate to lapidate the film.
- Variety: “An absolutely terrible, politically questionable and occasionally hilarious sex marathon.”
- Decide: “His capital clumsiness is sometimes funny. But she is as seductive as a washing machine manual.”
- Ready Steady Cut: “It wants to be the Polish ’50 Shades of Grey,’ and it’s bad enough to earn the comparison.”
- Diario El País: “It takes the basis of the erotic thriller as defined by Adrian Lyne in ‘Nineve semana y media’ and updates it for the current times, with a style halfway between a Maluma video clip and ‘La isla de las temptations’”.
- Diario Clarín: “The film includes dialogues of rancid machismo (…) if you have nothing to do, don’t watch ‘365′″.
#Netflixs #days #worst #movie #trilogy #movies #approval