With the profanity of “Kiss me the ****!”, an American sparked a revolt that became a turning point in the history of Panama.
This North American was one of the so-called filibusters, those men capable of doing dirty jobs in order to get wealth, be it with the gold rush in the western United States or also in foreign territories of the Caribbean and Central America.
They left from cities like New York or Boston together with immigrants who traveled to the Panamanian isthmus -which was then part of New Granada- on a journey of thousands of kilometers towards California.
On the street of La Ciénega, in the still rural city of Panama, the filibuster Jack Oliver insulted José Manuel Luna, a watermelon vendor on April 15, 1856.
“Be careful, we are not in the United States here,” the Panamanian responded to Oliver’s easy insult, who refused to pay 1 real (about 5 US cents) for the slice of watermelon he had eaten.
But what could have been an irrelevant street clash was actually a reflection of a boiling social situation.
“It must be understood that the deeper meaning of the watermelon slice incident is the manifestation of a first movement to dignify a humiliated people. That is the most important thing,” explains Dr. Hermann Güendel, a specialist in Latin American studies at the National University of Costa Rica and author of an analysis of the subject, to BBC Mundo.
The revolt it sparked lasted three days, resulting in the deaths of 16 Americans and two Panamanians, as well as a couple dozen wounded on both sides.
But since then, the so-called “watermelon slice incident” was capitalized by Washington to initiate an occupation of the strategic passage between the Pacific and the Atlantic in the future Panama Canal.
What happened before the incident?
Since the 1840s, the United States had a strategic presence on the Isthmus of Panama, where the Chagas River was the key passage to cross from the Pacific to the Atlantic without the need to skirt the entire continent.
The US signed the Mallarino-Bidlack Treaty with Nueva Granda (which included Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador and Panama) in 1846, with which it assured its citizens and economic interests privileged treatment when passing through the isthmus.
“In principle, this seemed to the Panamanian population at that time a golden opportunity for economic growth. They expected transportation, lodging, food. But the fact was quickly that it was left in the hands of the Americans themselves”, explains Güendel.
The train route of the Panama Canal Railway company replaced the trips in Panamanian boats. The hostels and soup kitchens that were opening in the towns of Colón and Panama were also left in the hands of the Americans.
And beyond that, Panamanians began to see arrogant attitudes from the Americans, who were hiding behind the 1846 treaty to act with many freedoms: “USA. It was already developing in the philosophy of Manifest Destiny, by which those in charge of bringing civilization to America are considered”, says Güendel.
“When the American migrants arrive, they bring that conception of the world, of Latin America, and this led them to an arrogant and mocking treatment of the population, its laws and the authorities of New Granada,” he adds.
How did the altercation take place?
On April 15, 1856, among the American travelers who arrived in Panama was Jack Oliver.
The man was accompanied by other filibusters. It was common for some of these “to take advantage of their short stay to satisfy their vices in gambling dens and taverns”, as described by the historian Juan Bautista Sosa in his “Compendium of the history of Panama” (1911).
In an apparent drunken state, Oliver went to José Manuel Luna’s stand and took a piece of watermelon. After half eating it, he threw it on the floor and when he tried to leave, the vendor demanded payment of one real. But Oliver snapped back and held up his gun. Luna took a knife from his stall, Sosa says.
Oliver’s classmate chose to pay for the slice of watermelon, which would have ended the problem. But a man, identified as Miguel Abraham, took advantage of the moment to snatch Oliver’s pistol, which led to a pursuit by the Americans.
“They chased the kidnapper with shots,” Sosa reports. Realizing this, nearby Panamanians became involved in the defense of Abraham and Luna. Then a brawl broke out between both sides that advanced to the train station, where Oliver entrenched.
Coincidentally, a train with more than 900 passengers, including men, women and children, was arriving.
The Panamanian guard went into action by order of Governor Francisco de Fábrega. They opened fire to repel the shots coming from the train station, which was eventually secured. But the altercation resulted in the deaths of 16 Americans, as well as two Panamanians, in addition to injuries on both sides.
A slice of almost half a million
Washington did not sit idly by. He instructed diplomat and agent Amos B. Corwine to conduct an investigation into what happened. He submitted a report on July 8, 1856 based on “witness statements to the attack and other collected supporting documents,” as recorded in the US National Archives.
Corwine, however, did not mention that the origin of the incident was Oliver’s wrongdoing. On the contrary, he recommended the military occupation of the strategic points in the passage of the isthmus, both in Colón and in Panama.
“In his report, he points out that it was all because of the brutality of the blacks, regardless of what the British, French and Ecuadorian consuls said, that it was the fault of the American filibusters,” explains Güendel.
The researcher notes that in the US the incident was reviewed in a derogatory manner, such as on the cover of the New York Illustrated newspaper, which recounted what happened in a very partial way.
“The image proposes a group of African savages, semi-dressed, with machetes, attacking white American knights, with their families and children. That is the conception, a relationship with savages, ”he points out.
Two ships and 160 military personnel took control of the territory of New Granada for three days in September 1856, thus giving rise to the first of a dozen US military interventions in Panama.
To settle the differences, the US and Nueva Granda convened a mixed commission to resolve the situation. One of the results was the payment of US$412,349 in gold by Nueva Granda, as well as guarantees on US interests in the isthmus.
“This forces New Granda to declare the autonomy of Panama and Colón in favor of the Americans. And the close to US$400,000, about US$2,000 million now, never reached the families of the dead Americans. The big winner of all this was the United States thanks to the ability to handle this situation,” says Güendel.
Basically, the researcher points out, the agreement between the parties did not resolve a social situation of oppression that had been perceived for years before the incident involving the slice of watermelon.
“The incident was a catharsis for a people who felt humiliated, sullied, as a way of freeing themselves from that feeling to which they were being subjected by the American presence. That is why the incident was a national cause”, affirms the academic.
“And in the end it was also a justification to occupy it militarily and over the years it will consolidate the US presence in the canal and the 5 km on each side of the canal that became US property.” , Add.
Control of the key passage between the Atlantic and the Pacific would last for more than a century and a half, until the last day of 1999.
Remember that you can receive notifications from BBC Mundo. Download the latest version of our app and activate them so you don’t miss out on our best content.
BBC-NEWS-SRC: https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/cz4n7d4d0vlo, IMPORTING DATE: 2023-08-02 04:00:10
#fight #piece #watermelon #caused #intervention #Panama