The Ras Al Khaimah Misdemeanors Court acquitted a (Khaliji) of the charge of signing a check worth 200,000 dirhams in bad faith, and in a manner that prevented its payment, after the report of the examination of forgery and forgery proved that the signature of the accused had been forged in a traditional way, and that he had not written the signature attributed to him.
The Public Prosecution indictment stated that the accused in bad faith gave a contracting company a check worth 200,000 dirhams for which he did not have sufficient payment, and deliberately signed it in a way that prevented its payment, and demanded that he be punished in accordance with the Commercial Transactions Law.
The case papers stated that a person submitted a report stating that the accused had given a contracting company in which he works a check for 200,000 dirhams without balance, in bad faith.
In the prosecution’s investigations, the accused denied signing the check, and stated that he handed the company’s engineer a blank check without any data, and accused the engineer of forging the check, and demanded the accused’s agent, Hanan Al-Bayed, to acquit her client, for lack of evidence and validity, and not signing the check.
The forgery examination report stated that the accused did not write the signature attributed to him appended to the check, and that the signature was forged in a traditional way, and that there was a difference between the signature of the check and the signature of the accused in the course of the written movement, and in the direction of the final formation of the signature.
In the verdict of the Misdemeanors Court, it is undisputed that it is agreed by law and jurisprudence that penal provisions are based on certainty and not mere doubt and guesswork, and that doubt benefits the accused and is interpreted in his favour, pointing out that Article 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates However, if the incident is not established, or the law does not punish it, the court shall rule the accused innocent, and he shall be released if he is imprisoned for the incident alone.
She explained that not enough conclusive evidence was presented to prove that the accused had committed the act attributed to him, as the papers contained only the complainant’s claim, not supported by any definitive evidence to support it, in return for the accused’s denial reinforced by the result of the report of the forgery and forgery examination unit, and accordingly the court ruled in his presence innocence accused of what was attributed to him.
The Ras Al Khaimah Misdemeanors Court acquitted a (Khaliji) of the charge of signing a check worth 200,000 dirhams in bad faith, and in a manner that prevented its payment, after the report of the examination of forgery and forgery proved that the signature of the accused had been forged in a traditional way, and that he had not written the signature attributed to him.
The Public Prosecution indictment stated that the accused in bad faith gave a contracting company a check worth 200,000 dirhams for which he did not have sufficient payment, and deliberately signed it in a way that prevented its payment, and demanded that he be punished in accordance with the Commercial Transactions Law.
The case papers stated that a person submitted a report stating that the accused had given a contracting company in which he works a check for 200,000 dirhams without balance, in bad faith.
In the prosecution’s investigations, the accused denied signing the check, and stated that he handed the company’s engineer a blank check without any data, and accused the engineer of forging the check, and demanded the accused’s agent, Hanan Al-Bayed, to acquit her client, for lack of evidence and validity, and not signing the check.
The forgery examination report stated that the accused did not write the signature attributed to him appended to the check, and that the signature was forged in a traditional way, and that there was a difference between the signature of the check and the signature of the accused in the course of the written movement, and in the direction of the final formation of the signature.
In the verdict of the Misdemeanors Court, it is undisputed that it is agreed by law and jurisprudence that penal provisions are based on certainty and not mere doubt and guesswork, and that doubt benefits the accused and is interpreted in his favour, pointing out that Article 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates However, if the incident is not established, or the law does not punish it, the court shall rule the accused innocent, and he shall be released if he is imprisoned for the incident alone.
She explained that not enough conclusive evidence was presented to prove that the accused had committed the act attributed to him, as the papers contained only the complainant’s claim, not supported by any definitive evidence to support it, in return for the accused’s denial reinforced by the result of the report of the forgery and forgery examination unit, and accordingly the court ruled in his presence innocence accused of what was attributed to him.
The Ras Al Khaimah Misdemeanors Court acquitted a (Khaliji) of the charge of signing a check worth 200,000 dirhams in bad faith, and in a manner that prevented its payment, after the report of the examination of forgery and forgery proved that the signature of the accused had been forged in a traditional way, and that he had not written the signature attributed to him.
The Public Prosecution indictment stated that the accused in bad faith gave a contracting company a check worth 200,000 dirhams for which he did not have sufficient payment, and deliberately signed it in a way that prevented its payment, and demanded that he be punished in accordance with the Commercial Transactions Law.
The case papers stated that a person submitted a report stating that the accused had given a contracting company in which he works a check for 200,000 dirhams without balance, in bad faith.
In the prosecution’s investigations, the accused denied signing the check, and stated that he handed the company’s engineer a blank check without any data, and accused the engineer of forging the check, and demanded the accused’s agent, Hanan Al-Bayed, to acquit her client, for lack of evidence and validity, and not signing the check.
The forgery examination report stated that the accused did not write the signature attributed to him appended to the check, and that the signature was forged in a traditional way, and that there was a difference between the signature of the check and the signature of the accused in the course of the written movement, and in the direction of the final formation of the signature.
In the verdict of the Misdemeanors Court, it is undisputed that it is agreed by law and jurisprudence that penal provisions are based on certainty and not mere doubt and guesswork, and that doubt benefits the accused and is interpreted in his favour, pointing out that Article 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates However, if the incident is not established, or the law does not punish it, the court shall rule the accused innocent, and he shall be released if he is imprisoned for the incident alone.
She explained that not enough conclusive evidence was presented to prove that the accused had committed the act attributed to him, as the papers contained only the complainant’s claim, not supported by any definitive evidence to support it, in return for the accused’s denial reinforced by the result of the report of the forgery and forgery examination unit, and accordingly the court ruled in his presence innocence accused of what was attributed to him.
The Ras Al Khaimah Misdemeanors Court acquitted a (Khaliji) of the charge of signing a check worth 200,000 dirhams in bad faith, and in a manner that prevented its payment, after the report of the examination of forgery and forgery proved that the signature of the accused had been forged in a traditional way, and that he had not written the signature attributed to him.
The Public Prosecution indictment stated that the accused in bad faith gave a contracting company a check worth 200,000 dirhams for which he did not have sufficient payment, and deliberately signed it in a way that prevented its payment, and demanded that he be punished in accordance with the Commercial Transactions Law.
The case papers stated that a person submitted a report stating that the accused had given a contracting company in which he works a check for 200,000 dirhams without balance, in bad faith.
In the prosecution’s investigations, the accused denied signing the check, and stated that he handed the company’s engineer a blank check without any data, and accused the engineer of forging the check, and demanded the accused’s agent, Hanan Al-Bayed, to acquit her client, for lack of evidence and validity, and not signing the check.
The forgery examination report stated that the accused did not write the signature attributed to him appended to the check, and that the signature was forged in a traditional way, and that there was a difference between the signature of the check and the signature of the accused in the course of the written movement, and in the direction of the final formation of the signature.
In the verdict of the Misdemeanors Court, it is undisputed that it is agreed by law and jurisprudence that penal provisions are based on certainty and not mere doubt and guesswork, and that doubt benefits the accused and is interpreted in his favour, pointing out that Article 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates However, if the incident is not established, or the law does not punish it, the court shall rule the accused innocent, and he shall be released if he is imprisoned for the incident alone.
She explained that not enough conclusive evidence was presented to prove that the accused had committed the act attributed to him, as the papers contained only the complainant’s claim, not supported by any definitive evidence to support it, in return for the accused’s denial reinforced by the result of the report of the forgery and forgery examination unit, and accordingly the court ruled in his presence innocence accused of what was attributed to him.