Columns In coronary vaccine drama, a stage has been reached in which one competes for who best understands the soul movements of the unvaccinated, writes Jari Tervo in his column

Anders Chydenius (1729–1803) accomplished much. He was a priest, but nevertheless advocated reason and enlightenment. Chydenius defended and promoted freedom of speech and religion at a time when it was rare. He was an economist who also made opium. Chydenius’s merits in vaccinating the people are vast.

Vaccination was not simple even in the 1760s.

Swedish The kingdom’s first vaccination against smallpox was carried out in Finland in 1754. It reduced infant mortality. The clergy were urged to promote vaccinations. Chydenius took action during the next epidemic. District doctor Hast vaccinated in the summer of 1761 with fifteen noble children.

However, the people did not want to count their children to be vaccinated. It was considered an interference with God’s will. This is what hihhulus have been up to for almost every human invention throughout history. The belief in the will of God, which caused mere pain and suffering, is also valid in modern times, even in the same case of vaccination.

Chydenius rushed for vaccinations at parish meetings in the summer of 1761. The jukur heads of the hosts of Alaveteli in Central Ostrobothnia did not turn around. Chydenius began to go from smoke to smoke and appealed to mothers who were not seen at the parish meetings. He addressed his parents’ conscience. They should be held accountable for their neglect in the matter of vaccination before God.

I think it is possible that Chydenius, as a fierce debater, may have asked his parents: who knows more precisely God’s possible will, the people or the priest? Did God want to fill the earth with people just to ruin the children, the fruits of His command, then the vaccine? Or had God still equipped man with a mind whose light he could sweeten and prolong his earthly journey, for example by vaccination?

Chydenius knew human nature and finally decided to appeal to Ostrobothnian iterality. He pointed out that burying children cost five to six times more than vaccinating them. Even baked goods.

District doctor In October 1761, Hast vaccinated 23 children of the people in Alaveteli. When smallpox spread to the area, those vaccinated did not become ill. Many unvaccinated people died or were injured. Doctor of Medical History Arno Forsius according to then, the minds of parents who opposed vaccination to the last degree and denied protection for their children also changed.

Anders Chydenius Rivakka and direct speech saved the lives of many children. If opponents of vaccination had had some at their disposal in the 18th century, we would have been able to read the critique: Papinretale intimidates mothers with the final verdict !, One child was vaccinated in Kruunupyy, and it fell from the top of the stable the very next summer !, Terrible guilt!

In coronary vaccine drama has reached a stage of competing for who best understands the soul movements of the unvaccinated. Some refuse to needle their stupidity, some their incompetence, some have followed the science of the snake tamer of the Ozark Mountains from a jute. However, no unvaccinated person should be adjusted to their tone. May still be injured, go to the lock and permanently refuse vaccination.

The arguments of unvaccinated people should be listened to as the narration of a full-fledged adult, but they should only be opposed as a defiant person. In this way, the unvaccinated have gotten what they have been trying to do: the usefulness of vaccination is supposedly a matter of opinion. No wonder.

Just in case, I want to remind opponents of vaccinations of one thing. Burial of relatives is still many times more expensive than vaccinating them.