Party leaders Wopke Hoekstra (CDA), Mark Rutte (VVD) and Sigrid Kaag (D66) take into account the possibility that the cabinet will fall over nitrogen or the asylum crisis. They gave air to that scenario in several television programs in recent days.s.
The two politically sensitive subjects of nitrogen and asylum hold the Netherlands in their grip on the way to the Provincial Council elections next Wednesday. Progress on both files is extremely difficult, but must be made in the coming months. It is remarkable that the leaders of three of the four coalition parties openly discuss the possibility of a cabinet crisis.
‘Didn’t see it coming at all’
Rutte spoke out about a possible crisis in WNL on Sunday. He doesn’t assume in the least, ‘but you never know for sure’. He referred to his second and third cabinets, which always succeeded. But in his first cabinet with the support of Wilders, it failed. “I didn’t see that coming at all.”
Hoekstra noted Buitenhof that the polarization has been maximum on the nitrogen dossier, where emissions must be reduced by half in 2030. “I think that we should find solutions with support in the Netherlands,” said Hoekstra. “It is not the goal to collapse the cabinet, but it can be the consequence.”
Kaag added on Monday morning good morning Netherlands nor do we know whether the current coalition with VVD, D66, CDA and ChristenUnie will survive the many crises it faces. According to Kaag, it is important for the cabinet to “straighten its back” and “we also have to regain our own resilience”, since agreements have been made in the coalition about asylum or nitrogen. “But I’ve always said: we do it right, or we don’t do it at all.”
‘Not lightly’
Hoekstra admitted that in the summer of 2022 he had thought about a possible cabinet crisis. That was in the summer that he declared the year 2030 ‘not sacred’. To reassure Hoekstra added: “You don’t throw in the towel about nitrogen or migration lightly.”
D66 Deputy Prime Minister Sigrid Kaag, also a guest in Outer Court, marked the nitrogen discussion: “We have had a policy of stagnation, will we continue to 2030 or will we let ourselves be held hostage by a policy of stagnation?” where the going gets tough, to speed up.
‘If necessary consequences’
Another thorny point in the nitrogen discussion is the possible expropriation of farmers by the government, who will then be forced to buy them out. VVD party chairman Sophie Hermans said about this Buitenhof that in provinces there is no course for expropriation. But: “Ultimately, if you don’t take your responsibility in a national problem, there will be consequences if necessary. That’s not quite there yet.”
CDA leader Hoekstra agreed with her: “The reality is that hardly anyone is bought out in the Netherlands. But none of us 17.5 million are guaranteed that it will never happen.”
Watch all our videos about politics here:
Comment can be found at the bottom of this article. Only comments with a full name are placed. We do that because we want a debate with people who stand for what they say, and therefore put their name to it. Those who still need to enter their name can do so by clicking ‘Login’ at the top right of our site.
Free unlimited access to Showbytes? Which can!
Log in or create an account and don’t miss a thing of the stars.
#Coalition #leaders #rule #cabinet #crisis #due #nitrogen #asylum