Russia has long resisted Ukraine’s move toward the European Union and the West’s defensive military alliance NATO, calling it a threat to its historical future as a nation and its sovereignty as a major nuclear power, horrific times for the people of Ukraine and for the rest of the continent as a superpower invades a nuclear European neighbor for the first time since the war. The second world, no matter how severe the sanctions, which will harm Europe as much as they will affect Russia, which is like shooting in the foot, and its impact on the global economy will have tangible repercussions in the short, medium and long term, and it is a dangerous indicator of global security, and what about the establishment of Other countries with the same movement against countries that pose a challenge to their security?
It is undoubtedly a process that is a turning point in the history of Europe and a question about the correctness of the American strategic assessment of dwarfing and besieging the Russian bear by limiting its options to direct threats to it through its neighbors and imposing sanctions on it. But has America developed the repercussions of that scenario, after the multiple fronts of the invasions in the world and besieging “NATO” with a reality that leads to a third world war?
Therefore, what Russia is doing today is an explicit attempt to raise its deterrence capacity and respond to events, which in turn will enable it to invest the emerging opportunities in the global strategic environment, and establish a vital field for its national security similar to its intervention in Syria, which is directed at NATO, Turkey and its waterways, and the growing conflict of anxiety in the atmosphere. And the movement of Chinese ships in the waters of Taiwan, after the idea of the vital field left the scope of military understanding only to the scope of political, economic and technological application.
The vital spheres of states differ according to their interests, the concept of the vital sphere that they embrace, and that the state is a living and elastic spatial organism in land, air, sea and space. In order to survive, it must expand and secure this field, even if by force, and transform the idea of physical borders into biological borders or transparent, i.e. mobile borders, in order to meet the needs and growth of countries and preserve their interests and qualitative superiority over their competitors. On the other hand, Putin is moving toward negotiating with Ukraine after it was attacked and buying time to make Kyiv accept Moscow’s terms. Can some additional regions be separated and made into independent states under Russian control?
We can say that Putin has upset the balance of the current security system in Europe, as if he is sending a message that this system is irreparably collapsible in a world in which Russia in Europe and China in Asia can demand intervention anywhere in the near or far abroad, and at any time it feels In it, its important interests are at stake, according to the orientation and doctrine of the political elite ruling the boundaries of that field. The Kremlin rejects not only Ukraine’s accession to NATO, but also the inclusion of any countries from Eastern Europe into the alliance.
And that Moscow is minutes away from the range of ballistic missiles of its competitors, after the deployment of US bases and forces in the Baltic Circle countries, sending troops to Lithuania and some Eastern European countries like Romania and Scandinavia such as Denmark, and conducting maneuvers in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, which is an American provocative framework to set up a trap for the Russians in Ukraine, the same Western trap set up by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the late seventies to impede the wheel of Russian growth.
* An Emirati researcher specializing in the affairs of peaceful coexistence and intercultural dialogue
The Kremlin rejects not only Ukraine’s accession to NATO, but also the inclusion of any countries from Eastern Europe into the alliance
Russia has long resisted Ukraine’s move toward the European Union and the West’s defensive military alliance NATO, calling it a threat to its historical future as a nation and its sovereignty as a major nuclear power, horrific times for the people of Ukraine and for the rest of the continent as a superpower invades a nuclear European neighbor for the first time since the war. The second world, no matter how severe the sanctions, which will harm Europe as much as they will affect Russia, which is like shooting in the foot, and its impact on the global economy will have tangible repercussions in the short, medium and long term, and it is a dangerous indicator of global security, and what about the establishment of Other countries with the same movement against countries that pose a challenge to their security?
It is undoubtedly a process that is a turning point in the history of Europe and a question about the correctness of the American strategic assessment of dwarfing and besieging the Russian bear by limiting its options to direct threats to it through its neighbors and imposing sanctions on it. But has America developed the repercussions of that scenario, after the multiple fronts of the invasions in the world and besieging “NATO” with a reality that leads to a third world war?
Therefore, what Russia is doing today is an explicit attempt to raise its deterrence capacity and respond to events, which in turn will enable it to invest the emerging opportunities in the global strategic environment, and establish a vital field for its national security similar to its intervention in Syria, which is directed at NATO, Turkey and its waterways, and the growing conflict of anxiety in the atmosphere. And the movement of Chinese ships in the waters of Taiwan, after the idea of the vital field left the scope of military understanding only to the scope of political, economic and technological application.
The vital spheres of states differ according to their interests, the concept of the vital sphere that they embrace, and that the state is a living and elastic spatial organism in land, air, sea and space. In order to survive, it must expand and secure this field, even if by force, and transform the idea of physical borders into biological borders or transparent, i.e. mobile borders, in order to meet the needs and growth of countries and preserve their interests and qualitative superiority over their competitors. On the other hand, Putin is moving toward negotiating with Ukraine after it was attacked and buying time to make Kyiv accept Moscow’s terms. Can some additional regions be separated and made into independent states under Russian control?
We can say that Putin has upset the balance of the current security system in Europe, as if he is sending a message that this system is irreparably collapsible in a world in which Russia in Europe and China in Asia can demand intervention anywhere in the near or far abroad, and at any time it feels In it, its important interests are at stake, according to the orientation and doctrine of the political elite ruling the boundaries of that field. The Kremlin rejects not only Ukraine’s accession to NATO, but also the inclusion of any countries from Eastern Europe into the alliance.
And that Moscow is minutes away from the range of ballistic missiles of its competitors, after the deployment of US bases and forces in the Baltic Circle countries, sending troops to Lithuania and some Eastern European countries like Romania and Scandinavia such as Denmark, and conducting maneuvers in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, which is an American provocative framework to set up a trap for the Russians in Ukraine, the same Western trap set up by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the late seventies to impede the wheel of Russian growth.
* An Emirati researcher specializing in the affairs of peaceful coexistence and intercultural dialogue
The Kremlin rejects not only Ukraine’s accession to NATO, but also the inclusion of any countries from Eastern Europe into the alliance
Russia has long resisted Ukraine’s move toward the European Union and the West’s defensive military alliance NATO, calling it a threat to its historical future as a nation and its sovereignty as a major nuclear power, horrific times for the people of Ukraine and for the rest of the continent as a superpower invades a nuclear European neighbor for the first time since the war. The second world, no matter how severe the sanctions, which will harm Europe as much as they will affect Russia, which is like shooting in the foot, and its impact on the global economy will have tangible repercussions in the short, medium and long term, and it is a dangerous indicator of global security, and what about the establishment of Other countries with the same movement against countries that pose a challenge to their security?
It is undoubtedly a process that is a turning point in the history of Europe and a question about the correctness of the American strategic assessment of dwarfing and besieging the Russian bear by limiting its options to direct threats to it through its neighbors and imposing sanctions on it. But has America developed the repercussions of that scenario, after the multiple fronts of the invasions in the world and besieging “NATO” with a reality that leads to a third world war?
Therefore, what Russia is doing today is an explicit attempt to raise its deterrence capacity and respond to events, which in turn will enable it to invest the emerging opportunities in the global strategic environment, and establish a vital field for its national security similar to its intervention in Syria, which is directed at NATO, Turkey and its waterways, and the growing conflict of anxiety in the atmosphere. And the movement of Chinese ships in the waters of Taiwan, after the idea of the vital field left the scope of military understanding only to the scope of political, economic and technological application.
The vital spheres of states differ according to their interests, the concept of the vital sphere that they embrace, and that the state is a living and elastic spatial organism in land, air, sea and space. In order to survive, it must expand and secure this field, even if by force, and transform the idea of physical borders into biological borders or transparent, i.e. mobile borders, in order to meet the needs and growth of countries and preserve their interests and qualitative superiority over their competitors. On the other hand, Putin is moving toward negotiating with Ukraine after it was attacked and buying time to make Kyiv accept Moscow’s terms. Can some additional regions be separated and made into independent states under Russian control?
We can say that Putin has upset the balance of the current security system in Europe, as if he is sending a message that this system is irreparably collapsible in a world in which Russia in Europe and China in Asia can demand intervention anywhere in the near or far abroad, and at any time it feels In it, its important interests are at stake, according to the orientation and doctrine of the political elite ruling the boundaries of that field. The Kremlin rejects not only Ukraine’s accession to NATO, but also the inclusion of any countries from Eastern Europe into the alliance.
And that Moscow is minutes away from the range of ballistic missiles of its competitors, after the deployment of US bases and forces in the Baltic Circle countries, sending troops to Lithuania and some Eastern European countries like Romania and Scandinavia such as Denmark, and conducting maneuvers in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, which is an American provocative framework to set up a trap for the Russians in Ukraine, the same Western trap set up by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the late seventies to impede the wheel of Russian growth.
* An Emirati researcher specializing in the affairs of peaceful coexistence and intercultural dialogue
The Kremlin rejects not only Ukraine’s accession to NATO, but also the inclusion of any countries from Eastern Europe into the alliance
Russia has long resisted Ukraine’s move toward the European Union and the West’s defensive military alliance NATO, calling it a threat to its historical future as a nation and its sovereignty as a major nuclear power, horrific times for the people of Ukraine and for the rest of the continent as a superpower invades a nuclear European neighbor for the first time since the war. The second world, no matter how severe the sanctions, which will harm Europe as much as they will affect Russia, which is like shooting in the foot, and its impact on the global economy will have tangible repercussions in the short, medium and long term, and it is a dangerous indicator of global security, and what about the establishment of Other countries with the same movement against countries that pose a challenge to their security?
It is undoubtedly a process that is a turning point in the history of Europe and a question about the correctness of the American strategic assessment of dwarfing and besieging the Russian bear by limiting its options to direct threats to it through its neighbors and imposing sanctions on it. But has America developed the repercussions of that scenario, after the multiple fronts of the invasions in the world and besieging “NATO” with a reality that leads to a third world war?
Therefore, what Russia is doing today is an explicit attempt to raise its deterrence capacity and respond to events, which in turn will enable it to invest the emerging opportunities in the global strategic environment, and establish a vital field for its national security similar to its intervention in Syria, which is directed at NATO, Turkey and its waterways, and the growing conflict of anxiety in the atmosphere. And the movement of Chinese ships in the waters of Taiwan, after the idea of the vital field left the scope of military understanding only to the scope of political, economic and technological application.
The vital spheres of states differ according to their interests, the concept of the vital sphere that they embrace, and that the state is a living and elastic spatial organism in land, air, sea and space. In order to survive, it must expand and secure this field, even if by force, and transform the idea of physical borders into biological borders or transparent, i.e. mobile borders, in order to meet the needs and growth of countries and preserve their interests and qualitative superiority over their competitors. On the other hand, Putin is moving toward negotiating with Ukraine after it was attacked and buying time to make Kyiv accept Moscow’s terms. Can some additional regions be separated and made into independent states under Russian control?
We can say that Putin has upset the balance of the current security system in Europe, as if he is sending a message that this system is irreparably collapsible in a world in which Russia in Europe and China in Asia can demand intervention anywhere in the near or far abroad, and at any time it feels In it, its important interests are at stake, according to the orientation and doctrine of the political elite ruling the boundaries of that field. The Kremlin rejects not only Ukraine’s accession to NATO, but also the inclusion of any countries from Eastern Europe into the alliance.
And that Moscow is minutes away from the range of ballistic missiles of its competitors, after the deployment of US bases and forces in the Baltic Circle countries, sending troops to Lithuania and some Eastern European countries like Romania and Scandinavia such as Denmark, and conducting maneuvers in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, which is an American provocative framework to set up a trap for the Russians in Ukraine, the same Western trap set up by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the late seventies to impede the wheel of Russian growth.
* An Emirati researcher specializing in the affairs of peaceful coexistence and intercultural dialogue
The Kremlin rejects not only Ukraine’s accession to NATO, but also the inclusion of any countries from Eastern Europe into the alliance