Once upon a time there was a good little wolf, a bad prince, a beautiful witch and an honest pirate; Once upon a time there was all these things, when I dreamed of a world upside down.
José Agustín Goytisolo
Once upon a time there was a naive girl who responded to the name of Isabelita Snow White, who, alas, always received abuse from her evil stepmother, who knows why, in a trick of fate, her name was Pedro and he was the cruelest being. of that enchanted forest.
So to defend the innocent creature, his seven dwarfs were planted there, who owed so much to Isabelita Snow White, transmuted into fierce swordsmen.
See them. (Today, almost monographic)
Abc. Salvador Sostres: “The first time he has truly felt cornered was by Isabel Ayuso because both his wife and the attorney general’s situation is tense in the very specific origin of the attacks on the president’s relatives. She and Miguel Ángel have been able to understand what the poison for the rat is”; Isabel San Sebastián: “That gallant attitude has made Isabel [Díaz Ayuso] in Sánchez’s nightmare, or who knows if his wet dream, at the same time that he expands his figure among the majority of Spaniards, fed up with Sanchismo and eager for an alternative”; Ignacio Camacho: “Sanchez’s fixation with Ayuso is a mixture of political tactics – to ignore Feijóo – and narcissistic jealousy.” (Jealousy: irreversible and multifactorial delusional disorder that makes the patient think that their partner is unfaithful); Teodoro León Gross: “The latest joke of Sanchismo is to cross themselves, scandalized by Ayuso’s decision to abandon Sánchez. ‘Institutional scandal! Scandal!’ They cry out like very red-faced Ursulines that they had made a mistake in the cinema by entering a theater “Sánchez giving lessons on institutionality is equivalent to Trump offering a course on good manners.”
The World. Federico Jiménez-Losantos: “If (…) the PP asked its voters (…) about Ayuso’s sit-in with Sánchez (…) what would come out? That an overwhelming majority supports Ayuso, and feels betrayed again by this PP, the same one from Casado who already wanted to kill her. The idiots from Genoa, 13, are trying to get 1% of the socialist vote, instead of going for the 10% of Vox, which was dead and they have resurrected it. “They neither know how to add nor do they know how to excite.” The reason. Its director, Francisco Marhuenda: “Ayuso is doing very well by rejecting the meeting with Sánchez. It is something that all good people will value. The two reasons given are unquestionable. You cannot sit with someone who has negotiated the breakup of the Spanish Treasury and has surrendered to the independence movement. It is true that there are more reasons, although the self-conscious sector of the PP does not understand them (…) As a matter of personal and political dignity, out of respect for the institutions, Ayuso does not have to meet with a politician who lies and insults him whenever he can ”; editorial: “Neither his parents nor his brother nor his partner have been spared from official slander in a mafia operation to harm, through their loved ones, the adversary that they have not been able to defeat in a fair fight and that has taken the most important position from them.” desired as Madrid is. We cannot think of greater vileness in this distraught regime that has taken a flight forward, harassed by its corruption scandals”; José Antonio Vera: “Isabel Primera de Madrid is adored in the circles for how she handled the pandemic, opening the gambling dens that Pedro, like Maduro, closed. In Sol you had dinner until 12 O’clok in bars and taverns. Illa-mascarilla decreed at six, general lowering of awnings and blinds, despite the fact that there were no more infections in the capital than in Barcelona or Malaga. “Open-Madrid versus closed Spain.”
Don’t fall short. Digital Freedom. Editorial: “Institutionality is preserved by not lending itself to the traps of a president who, in addition, insults you. The presence of Ayuso in La Moncloa so that Sánchez can try to place damaged merchandise from his pacts with separatism would be a detriment to the dignity of all Madrid residents”; Pablo Planas: “To plant Sánchez is to defend democracy. Meeting with Sánchez is going into the lion’s den and endorsing his project to destroy Spain”; Pablo Molina: “The only popular leader consistent with the initial position of her party has been the president of Madrid (…) What is worth asking, therefore, is not whether the president of Madrid ‘respects the institutions’, but what the other popular presidents meeting with Sánchez in La Moncloa”; Pedro de Tena: “The political analysis of Sanchismo, accurate like few others, has understood that, in the event that Isabel Díaz Ayuso agreed to direct the national policy of the PP, her results from Madrid could be extrapolated to the rest of Spain. This woman, another annoying trait, could unify around herself the speeches of PP, Vox and the remains of parties such as UPyD, Ciudadanos and many supporters on social networks (…) they are achieving the opposite of what they pursue: that Isabel Díaz Ayuso is increasingly considered the Galdosian figure that the center-right needs so that the Spain of the Transition and the Constitution is not destroyed by its enemies”; Agapito Maestre: “The truth is that the presidents of the autonomous communities governed by the PP have gone to Moncloa to meet with Sánchez. In other words, whether willingly or not, they have legitimized the dictator a little more (…) This crude stratagem was denounced by Díaz Ayuso with clarity and distinction (…) Díaz Ayuso was right.”
OKdiary. Editorial: “This is not a Government, it is the Stasi. The Government’s threats and its campaign of harassment against Ayuso’s partner are more typical of a totalitarian regime than of a democracy.” The Debate. Editorial: “Ayuso is right: the institutional boycott is promoted by Sánchez. The president’s sit-in is legitimate and necessary due to the institutional, legal and personal disloyalties of the socialist leader”; Luis Ventoso: “With Sánchez, not even taking a Fanta. Ayuso is right to plant it, it makes no sense to meet with a leader who defames you and when your party is asking for his resignation for being corrupt (…) At this point in the race, with Sánchez the only thing that can be applied is that maxim of the only good Marxists, Groucho and his brothers: ‘More wood!’” Vozpópuli. Carlos Souto: “The only one who assumes that the president is playing with a clear deck is Díaz Ayuso, while the PP puts on a poor political show that is even less sympathetic, now that the summer is over”; Miguel Giménez: “In an interview/massage that a couple of quidams were doing to Irene Montero, one said to her in a fit of podemitic passion ‘You have a pussy like this table.’ I will not say that, because the president is a lady and I am a Legionary Knight. But I would like to suggest the image of Espartero’s horse and that of the president. If they establish a relationship, it is up to them.”
And, finally, Antonio R. Naranjo, in The Debate: “Ayuso has a pair of ovaries, a feminine condition that arouses more suspicion than the same testicular attributes in men (…) Sánchez is just as macho and gentlemanly as Pablo Iglesias, a top alpha male, but somewhat more perfected in the forms, which adds to that emotional registration in a harem full of ideological concubines like Pilar Alegría or Isabel Rodríguez, a sectarianism unbecoming of a statesman (…) Ayuso, more than president of Madrid, is a symbol of resistance, imperfect, but honest, who stands up to a market satrap with more pretensions than talent, votes, ideas and energy.”
Errejón, you ask me? A. And that’s enough. Isn’t that enough?
Okdiario. Eduardo Inda: The symbols of progressivism, a liberator of rapists (Montero) and a sexual predator (Errejón).”
As always, last minutes of fantasy.
The reason. Pedro Narváez: “No. It’s not that I don’t like that Almodóvar talks about politics but rather how tacky he does it. (…) Almodóvar (…) deeply irritates those of us who thought that the main cause of CO2 was the smell of Ángel de Andrés’ feet in ‘What have I done to deserve this?’ or Carmen Maura’s farts in ‘Volver’. “A dying woman wearing a sweater from the latest Loewe collection dies less.”
The Debate. Alfonso Ussía: “Both my wife and I forgot to cover them with covers. And my four jackets have been riddled with holes by moths, who like ‘cashmere’ more than a lobster likes a union member of the UGT or Workers’ Commissions.” Vozpópuli. Juan Abreu: “Sanchez’s strategy consists, summarily, of (…) making official, normalizing and even socializing his immorality. Or, to put it in my holy mother’s terms, turn Spain into a country governed by ‘shits’ for those who vote ‘shits’. Unfortunately, Sánchez and his ETA and anti-Spanish separatist allies have managed to carry out their demoralizing plan and under his rule Spain has become a country aligned with the evil (read immorality) of the world: Hamas, Islamism, Wokism (and its new assigned enemy, the heterosexual white man), womanism, blackness, Venezuela, Cuba, China, Agenda 2030, or Russia.”
Antonio Naranjo again, The Debate: “What is it about parading around in your panties while being hot when, I swear, you can do it with excess kilos and showing a few centimeters of alternative femininity beneath the burqa?” And in the same medium, Enrique García-Máiquez. Commentary on the biography of Franco’s minister Gregorio López Bravo: “In the book we witness a Spain that worked, both in its transportation, its industry and its international relations. Growth and effectiveness are glimpsed between the lines, while one witnesses the detailed account of López Bravo’s tireless work. The contrast with the current reality of Spain and the category of its ministers falls under its own weight.” What times those were! How happy the Spaniards were with the Generalissimo, and not like now, in this miserable democracy!
And for dessert, so as not to lose the habit, delicious tiramisu.
The Gazette. Toni Cantó. Yes, Toni Cantó: “Whenever they ask me in restaurants if I suffer from any allergies, I answer yes: to socialism (…) The unpresentable hairy man in charge of the infrastructure, a bully who laughs in our faces and publicly insults those who criticize him , makes me vomit every time I suffer the delays of their trains (…) The sucker that collects and squeezes us more and more (…) my parts itch (…) I shit on the biggest chorizo, who tried a pucherazo in his party, falsified a thesis, lied profusely and has half the family involved in corrupt plots. I suffer from an increasingly serious allergy, yes. To socialism. To their representatives. And also to those who vote for them despite everything.”
See you, if we hold out, next Sunday.
#candid #Isabelita #Snow #White #stepmother #called #Pedro
