Seville’s audience avoids clarifying Griñán why he raises the option to take the ERE to European justice

The Hearing of Seville has denied the defense of the former socialist president of the Junta de Andalucía José Antonio Griñán the possibility of clarifying his providence in which he asks that the parties of the ERE case are pronounced on whether the Constitutional Court “has been overwhelmed” making an “alternative interpretation of prevarication and embezzlement.”

In a providence issued on March 27, the First Section of the Hearing accounts for the request of the representation of Griñán and states that “the signature of the providence has been produced by the magistrate speaker, as has been done in all the measures issued in this procedure.”

It also defends the non -appealing nature of providence because “the procedure of allegations to the Fiscal Ministry and the personnel is forced” by law, settling that “there is no place to clarify because the providence clearly exposes the issues that are submitted to the parties.”

It should be remembered that, after accepting the envy of the PP and raising the possibility that the sentences of the TC in the ERE case were not “completely compatible” with the right of the European Union, in an ordination diligence the hearing has asked the Court of Guarantees to explain why and why the providence in which it asked the parties that were positioned on the possibility of raising a consultation to Europe has claimed.