The future of the San Siro stadium represents one of the dossiers to be resolved for the next municipal administration
Giungi (Pd): “Double stage? Not an idea to be rejected immediately”
Two stages? “It is not an idea that can be rejected immediately, it must still be examined and above all debated with the teams.” This was stated by the municipal councilor of the Democratic Party and president of the Olympics Council Commission Alessandro Giungi, on the sidelines of the Round Table on San Siro, interviewed by Mianews, regarding the proposal made by the Brothers of Italy and in particular by Ignazio La Russa for the creation of a committee that supports the coexistence of two stadiums, without destroying San Siro.
“I believe that on this aspect it is necessary to understand if there is an interest on the part of those who in the other stadium will have to go to play, or Milan or Inter. The clubs need to have their say on this aspect, because they are two plants, so I imagine that one would become the prerogative of Inter and one of Milan “, he concluded.
Monguzzi (Verdi): “No to the new plant”
“We are against the consumption of soil. San Siro is already there. It can be restructured, it is not clear why it is necessary to build one next to it on a very beautiful green lawn”. Like this Carlo Monguzzi, group leader of the Greens in the Municipality, interviewed by Mianews, on the sidelines of the second edition of the Round Table on San Siro organized by Coordinamento San Siro, commented on the proposal of the Brothers of Italy to create a committee in favor of the “two stages” explained on Monday from Ignazio La Russa which would have already identified the possible chairmen of the committee, Ernesto Pellegrini And Maurizio Dallocchio.
Facchetti: “Two stadiums? They should be in different parts of the city”
“I can’t imagine two stadiums. If there were to be different stadiums in different parts of the city, a hypothesis that had been advanced with the previous management of the clubs, in areas where there was nothing and could be grown by building new plants. I find it hard to imagine two stadiums a hundred meters away from each other, it seems a bit senseless to me “. He said it Gianfelice Facchetti, actor and son of the former Inter flag Giacinto, interviewed by Mianews.
Trotta: “Two-stage hypothesis difficult to sustain”
“I think that two stadiums close to San Siro represent a difficult hypothesis to support. It is true that in most European cities there are more stadiums, football teams own their stadiums and there are municipal stadiums, but not attacked. to each other. Two stadiums in the same area frankly seems to me a difficult hypothesis to support. Supporting the idea that there are more stadiums in a city like Milan is obviously not something that can be done before the Olympics, but it is a process that will have to be initiated and it seems to me a completely correct idea “. He said it Claudio Trotta, promoter and one of the promoters of the Sì Meazza Committee, on the sidelines of the round table on San Siro, interviewed by Mianews.
On the possibility of opening a dialogue with the Committee in favor of the two stadiums, Trotta said: “I think we need to dialogue with everyone, but the Sì Meazza Committee was born with a main task: to prevent the stadium from being demolished. We want to stay focused on this theme, not even considering alternative projects for now. I personally appreciate the Aceti e Magistretti project, but it is premature. The theme now is that the San Siro stadium should not be demolished “, he concluded.
De Chirico (FI): “The majority of the stadium is chaos”
“Ever since Sala declared the public utility of the project for the new sports and entertainment district in San Siro there has been a succession of declarations. There are those who ask for the public debate to be promoted, those who ask that the Milanese decide through the referendum, who is collecting illustrious signatures to save the Meazza, who organizes meetings in the theater and who wants to set up the committee for the two stadiums. Then there are three presidents of municipal commissions (Fedrighini, Ceccarelli and Giungi) who ask through a letter that their commissions are to take care of the new stadium, but exclude the president of the sports commission, Angelica Vasile, from the matter. On the subject of the new sports facility, total chaos reigns in the majority that administers Palazzo Marino with the exponents of the colorful Milanese left looking for a lifesaver so as not to lose face after the electoral promises “. Alessandro De Chirico, parent company of Forza Italia at Palazzo Marino.
Monguzzi: “Compulsory public debate, there are no more excuses”
Monguzzi returned today to the theme of the stadium: “While the Municipality got lost in impeding observations and requests for opinions, the Hummingbird Committee promoting the” You know you can “campaign sent a question to the National Public Debate Commission, sending the various attachments Resolution of the City Council of 11/5/2021 on the public interest relating to the Stadium. The President of the Commission, Caterina Cittadino, replied as follows: “… in the present case, the work in question falls within the type of infrastructure .. .for which the dimensional thresholds provided for in annex 1 of Prime Ministerial Decree no. 76/2018 for the mandatory nature of public debates, are established to the extent that the total investments exceed € 300 million net of VAT, unless the work is not included among those of the PNRR or PNC … “.
Now there are no more excuses, it is essential to urgently prepare the Public Debate by informing and involving the citizens “. Thus the group leader of the Greens in the Municipality, Carlo Monguzzi.” We asked for the public debate according to the Municipal Regulations – adds Monguzzi -, there is We were told that a codicil clashed with the National Law, so we presented a measure to eliminate the codicil, and we asked for the National Public Debate anyway, but we were told that the law on stadiums would have waived the obligation of the same. it is clearer and simpler, even if we have lost 20 days and we make our own the thought of the Colibrì Committee: “in the last 10 years Milan has given its best when it is open to authentic listening to all people, especially on issues on which it was decided not to take sides in the electoral campaign. We do not want to see the city and its administration go back to the dark years in which decisions were made without consulting the citizens ”. If the Municipality had listened to comrade Monguzzi, these absurd days would have been avoided “, concludes the same councilor.
#San #Siro #hypothesis #stadiums #returns #debate