The prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) indicated that he had opened an investigation into the situation in Ukraine for allegations of “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity” committed by Russia. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), of the UN, called for its side hearings on March 7 and 8 about complaints filed by Ukraine, about actions of the Russian troops that invaded the country. Here are five questions about the legal situation after the invasion.
Also read: Can the ICC open a case against Russia for aggression against Ukraine?
Did Russia break international law?
Russia violated Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, which prohibits the use of force at the international level, says Geoff Gordon, a senior fellow at the Hague-based Asser Institute for International and European Law. “The use of Russian military force is not unknown” in Ukraine, added Philippe Sands, a professor of international law who works in the United Kingdom. But today (…) there are rules to protect us from such actsreflected in the UN Charter, the closest thing we have to an international Constitution,” Sands warns in an article in the Financial Times. “It is the most important commitments of the Charter that (Vladimir) Putin has underestimated,” he says. .
Which courts can try Ukraine-related matters?
It may interest you: Ukraine reports more than 2,000 civilians killed in seven days of Russian invasion
Ukraine appeared before the ICJ (International Court of Justice), which will hold hearings on March 7 and 8 to determine its legal competence in this case, says Gordon. In addition, national courts can also try cases related to violations of international law, he adds. Russia could also have to appear before the European Court of Human Rights, being accused by Kiev of violations in that area. Ukraine is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, the founding treaty of the ICCHowever, in 2014 it formally recognized its jurisdiction with respect to crimes committed in its territory. Russia, for its part, has withdrawn from the ICC, which is why it cannot prosecute Russian citizens on Russian soil, but only if they are detained on the territory of a state that does recognize its jurisdiction. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) said Tuesday that it will hold hearings on March 7 and 8 in a case brought to it by Ukraine, which accuses Russia of plotting genocide. The presiding judge of the Court, Joan Donoghue, drew Russia’s attention “to the need to act in such a way that any decision of the Court can have the desired effects,” said the ICJ, the main judicial body of the United Nations, based in Hague.
Can individuals be held liable?
Yes. The ICC prosecutes those accused of the worst atrocities committed in the world, which includes genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Individuals can also be prosecuted by national courts. However, even the ICC cannot judge the crime of aggression — the attack by one state against another planned by a political or military leader — if that country has not ratified the Rome Statute, which is the case with Russia and Ukraine. However, Sands suggested creating an international (‘ad hoc’) criminal court devoted to Russian aggression against Ukraine.
What’s next now?
According to Cecily Rose, assistant professor of public international law at the University of Leiden (Netherlands), the hearings and the decision of the ICJ could come soon under “urgency”. As for the ICC, it could issue indictments if the magistrates determine that it has sufficient jurisdiction and evidence, or if a Member State brings the case directly to that court.
Also read: The controversial end of Joe Biden’s speech and the accusations against him
What effects will it have?
Difficult to predict, according to experts. The ICJ, whose sentences are final and unappealable, “does not have a classic application mechanism” to enforce them, Gordon points out. For its part, the ICC does not have its own police force and relies on member states to make arrests. “On the other hand, we are witnessing the mobilization of a series of more or less coordinated mechanisms, whose objective is to punish Russia for waging an illegal war”, such as the economic sanctions, travel restrictions and cancellation of sporting events, Gordon says. “An ICJ ruling could play a role in such actions in the future,” she estimates.
AFP
More news
Vladimir Putin’s nuclear threat: a false or real danger?
‘We have reached a historic turning point’: German ambassador
#Russia #faces #potential #legal #liability #Ukraine #invasion
