Nilson Domínguez, the 33 -year -old young Venezuelan, has given his version about why he did not testify in Daniel Sancho’s trial in Thailand. As explained in exclusive statements To the magazine ‘Readings’, its departure from the witness list occurred at the last moment, just before traveling to Madrid to make the scale to Koh Samui. “I traveled from the state of Zulia to the capital of Venezuela, which is where international flights come from,” he said and said he had the ticket purchased and the reservation in a hotel in Barajas.
Nilson argues that everything changed when he received indications from Ramón Chippirras, a member of the Legal Team of Daniel Sancho, about what he should declare: “While at the airport, I spend a photo of Ramón and all that process and that is when he tells me that I have to work, everything I have to say, and he explains the situation and I tell them that we have not talked about that moment they made it clear that his testimony would only be valid if he made certain statements: «He told me it was important, because without that my testimony would not matter. I told him that I was not going to declare that, ”he concludes about the alleged turn in his testimony of the alleged” abuse “of the Colombian surgeon.
After refusing to modify his version, the witness ensures that the pressures and accusations against him began. “They begin to tell me that they will report me by extortion, that this trip has cost them a lot of money,” which is why he decided not to travel and depart from the judicial process.
Eager that his version of the events was heard, he began publishing information on his social networks, where he has even shared the alleged audios that Rodolfo Sancho would have sent him trying to convince him to declare. In addition, the Venezuelan explains that he feels censored for the elimination of his interview in the documentary ‘Recipe for a murder’ of Skyshowtime and ensures that he was a victim of “months of coercion to go to a trial to declare facts that were not true.” “They even edited messages to make me bad before the people of a country, and Edwin’s own family,” he says.
For his part, Domínguez took advantage of his social networks to express his regret for the damage caused to the image of Edwin ArietA, ensuring that they have been “double victims.” “Not only with Edwin’s physical loss, but they have had to see how his image has been stained, until he is responsible for his own death,” he wrote in his networks.
In his defense, Nilson maintains that his testimony was going to be key to supporting Daniel Sancho’s theory of defense, who stated that he had acted in “legitimate defense” after an alleged fight with the Colombian surgeon. However, unable to fit their version with the evidence presented, the lawyers ended up separating it from the case and accusing it of extortion.
Now, Nilson has filed a lawsuit in the Canary Islands with the criminal lawyer Alfredo Arriess and continues to share information on networks to, according to him, to “shed light” about what happened. In addition, he assures that he was offered 10 thousand euros for his testimony and that his participation in the documentary ‘Recipe for murder’ was eliminated by alleged External pressures.
#Nilson #Domínguez #tells #version #departure #Daniel #Sanchos #trial #told #declare
