Unanimity among associations due to the rush to reform the PSOE and limits that may be unconstitutional
The four associations of judges criticize the bill registered yesterday for limiting popular action, for its haste and because it seems created “for specific cases”, with “names and surnames.” Thus, the president of the Professional Association of the Judiciary (APM), …
Session limit reached
- Access to Premium content is open courtesy of the establishment you are in, but right now there are too many users logged in at once. Please try again after a few minutes.
try again
You have exceeded the session limit
- You can only have three sessions started at a time. We have closed the oldest session so you can continue browsing the rest without limits.
Keep browsing
Article for subscribers only
Report a bug
#Judges #popular #accusations #benefited #cases