The State Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, recriminated to the judge of the Supreme Court Ángel Hurtado who, in his opinion, is instructing the cause by revelation of secrets against him so that part of a “certainty” that “does not lead to the discovery of The truth “, something that believes that” harms him. ” In addition, he reported how, according to his version, He usually erases “everything” on his mobile phone “regularly”which is why no messages have been found during the investigation.
In the transcription of the statement he gave last week to the Supreme, to which he has had access 20 minutesGarcía Ortiz was asked about the state lawyer who represents him – he did not answer the judge or the accusations – about the non -existence of messages between the key days from March 8 to 14 on the mobile phone that the Civil Guard seized him in The course of research. In this regard, he assured that he erases “everything, absolutely everything” the content of his terminals “on a regular basis” because In the Prosecutor’s Office “ultra sensitive data” are handled and cannot afford “the luxury of losing or that a terminal” with that information reaches third parties.
According to his version, he deleted the content of his phone “because It is a legal imposition“:” We must erase the data of our terminals and I do not say it, says the EU Data Protection Regulation, says the Spanish Data Protection Law, says any regulatory instrument, says the INCIBE, the Ministry of Justice, because there is a basic principle in the data, which is the non -conservation of data when they are not necessary. “
The Attorney General denied “flatly” on several occasions to have leaked The emails exchanged by prosecutor Julián Salto with the defense of Alberto González Amador, boyfriend of Isabel Díaz Ayuso who is investigated for fiscal fraud and who at the same time exercises the particular accusation in the case against García Ortiz.
At the beginning of the appearance, the attorney general explained Why I was not going to answer the questions or the judge or the particular accusation. As for Judge Hurtado, García Ortiz considers that the entry and registration of his office “was invasive of fundamental rights” and recalls that he has asked for his nullity, something that the Supreme Court had not given an answer. “That resource has not been resolved,” he lamented, to add that the requisition could be “the entire base of the imputation that took place.”
In addition, he affected the magistrate to have ordered a series of proceedings that he had not informed his defense, and that would prevent him from being “exact” in his answers. “I would give me Little opportunity to be accurate in my answers If I didn’t keep them in mind when answering, “he explained.
And he added to this that he understood that The object of the “is not fixed” process in terms that can guarantee your defense. In addition, he clarified that some of the defense proceedings he requested and were “absolutely indispensable” to exercise his defense were “denied by the instructor magistrate.” “I think that with a predetermination that I understand, and I tell it with absolutely defense terms and without the intention of entering controversy, that the instructor magistrate has a certainty that does not lead us to the discovery of the truth, and I think that situation to me that situation He harmed, “he said.
As for the private accusation, the attorney general said before the judge that the complaint that filed against Alberto González Amador for revelation of secrets “omitted” that his lawyer sent to the chief of the cabinet of Ayuso, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, At least one of the emails that crossed with the prosecutor of economic crimes that investigated him.
“The complaint (…) omits fundamental data that have come out in the instruction(…) there is at least one of the emails that has been transmitted in real time immediately: at the time his lawyer receives it, he transmits it to the president of the president’s cabinet, and this does not appear in The facts of the complaint, “he explained.
He indicated that this detail was “relevant” because it shows that “there is a start of transfer of information that certainly does not appear in those facts”, adding that the complainant “It has not been loyal with the courtssince he has omitted facts that are fundamental “because he has caused” an investigation towards the Prosecutor’s Office. “
García Ortiz added to this that he also considered relevant that González Amador, on the key days from March 12 to 14, 2024, “could perfectly refuse the lie that it was being transmitted to the networks, and did not do it “, referring to the news that who offered a agreement of conformity was the Prosecutor’s Office and not its defense.” I believe that this behavior is not typical of those who want to keep a secret, And I think the lie is not, it can never be a secret. “
#García #Ortiz #justified #judge #deletion #messages #regular #mobile #ultra #sensitive #data
