A man offered 59,000 dirhams to a (foreign) woman in order to restore her private restaurant, but she refused to return the amount unlawfully, which led them to the corridors of the courts. The case for lack of evidence.
The verdict was not accepted by the man, so he appealed against him and asked for the ruling to oblige the woman to pay him 59,000 dirhams, explaining that the appealed ruling erred in applying the law and the shortcomings in causation, corruption in inference, and a violation of the established papers, where the plaintiff presented a written testimony signed by the woman’s partner, who confirmed She owes him the amount in question. The court ruled to reject the appeal, and obligated the plaintiff to pay fees, expenses and attorney’s fees.
A man offered 59,000 dirhams to a (foreign) woman in order to restore her private restaurant, but she refused to return the amount unlawfully, which led them to the corridors of the courts. The case for lack of evidence.
The verdict was not accepted by the man, so he appealed against him and asked for the ruling to oblige the woman to pay him 59,000 dirhams, explaining that the appealed ruling erred in applying the law and the shortcomings in causation, corruption in inference, and a violation of the established papers, where the plaintiff presented a written testimony signed by the woman’s partner, who confirmed She owes him the amount in question. The court ruled to reject the appeal, and obligated the plaintiff to pay fees, expenses and attorney’s fees.
A man offered 59,000 dirhams to a (foreign) woman in order to restore her private restaurant, but she refused to return the amount unlawfully, which led them to the corridors of the courts. The case for lack of evidence.
The verdict was not accepted by the man, so he appealed against him and asked for the ruling to oblige the woman to pay him 59,000 dirhams, explaining that the appealed ruling erred in applying the law and the shortcomings in causation, corruption in inference, and a violation of the established papers, where the plaintiff presented a written testimony signed by the woman’s partner, who confirmed She owes him the amount in question. The court ruled to reject the appeal, and obligated the plaintiff to pay fees, expenses and attorney’s fees.
A man offered 59,000 dirhams to a (foreign) woman in order to restore her private restaurant, but she refused to return the amount unlawfully, which led them to the corridors of the courts. The case for lack of evidence.
The verdict was not accepted by the man, so he appealed against him and asked for the ruling to oblige the woman to pay him 59,000 dirhams, explaining that the appealed ruling erred in applying the law and the shortcomings in causation, corruption in inference, and a violation of the established papers, where the plaintiff presented a written testimony signed by the woman’s partner, who confirmed She owes him the amount in question. The court ruled to reject the appeal, and obligated the plaintiff to pay fees, expenses and attorney’s fees.