Referendum euthanasia, Flick: “Right not to admit the question”
There Consult rejected, among the various proposed referendums, also the one on Euthanasia, considered “inadmissible“. One of the leading experts, the former head of the Constitutional Court Giovanni Maria Flick, who defended the decision taken by the former fellow judges. “These are unwarranted controversies. And the president did well – explains Flick to Corriere della Sera Giuliano Amato to answer. The Court’s first duty is to explain. Then we will read the motivation. The question that essentially required the transfer of the rules onsuicide aid tomurder of the consenting party, through the ruling of the Court. This is not possible with an abrogative referendum which it cannot entail additions to the question and text“.
“Why – continues Flick al Corriere – suicide aid it is different from murder. Even of those who allow or ask for it. If the question had been accepted, only the murder of the mentally ill or the minor. Not of the one who accepts the friend’s request: “You pull the trigger because I don’t feel like it. Or whoever launches a challenge. Let’s think about Tik Tok. There are child’s play challenges that can be deadly: who stays longer with a plastic bag on their head or on a train track. Everything would be legalized“.
READ ALSO
Green Pass abolished for all. In a few days, there is the date: here it is
Super Green Pass, an obligation over 50. But the Treasury does not have the No Vax lists
26-year-old nurse dead, car crash: “Exhausted after 2 night shifts”
#Euthanasia #referendum #Flick #legalized #deadly #challenges #Tik #Tok