Imagine the following scene. It’s Friday afternoon, it’s a fortnight, you decide to share those moments with your partner, your friends or your family. Furthermore, you decide to celebrate your Dad, Grandfather or Partner for Father’s Day. Party weekend, you can’t imagine that in a Diary widely circulated just published a decree evening. The newspaper in question is Official Journal of the Federationhe official government newspaper of our country, this couple of reforms that should not go unnoticed.
The first reform is the addition of article 9 to the Amnesty Lawwhich, as we already talked about in the column we titled “The President Can Pardon Anyone,” which we wrote when it was sent to the Federal Executive the reform to this Law, allows the latter to grant pardon to any person for the simple fact that the President so wishes.
The second reform is a little more sensitive, it is published that a paragraph of an article is repealed, the content is not specified, and a paragraph is added to the end of another article, these of the Protection Law. The deleted first paragraph expressly states: “The amparo jurisdictional body may exceptionally grant the suspension, even when dealing with the cases provided for in this article, if in its opinion the refusal of the suspension measure could cause greater harm to the corporate interest.” . What is not transcribed is that article 129 of the Law is on the following topics: “Article 129. It will be considered, among other cases, that there is damage to the social interest or provisions of public order are contravened, when, in the suspension is granted: …”, and then come 13 fractions, at the end of which our aforementioned paragraph is eliminated.
Finally, two lines are added to the end of article 148, which reads to the letter: “In the case of amparo proceedings that resolve the unconstitutionality of general norms, in no case will the suspensions issued establish general effects.”
This reform means that with the aforementioned modifications, the judges will not be able to nullify for all Mexicans or foreigners who want to do business in Mexico, the laws that, issued by the Legislative Branch, contradict the Mexican Constitution. That is to say, as of June 17, if a law harms him, he will have to hire a lawyer who knows about protection to defend his interests. It will be a problem for those who cannot afford one. More than a small reform, the modification undermines the counterweight that the Judiciary offers against “inadequate” reforms, leaving citizens who are informed alone to be able to defend themselves. Will it apply now? Does ignorance of the reform exclude its application?
Maybe the writer is a bad thinker and it was the best time to publish the reformbut it reminds me the times when MORENA was called PRI.
More from the same author:
#Early #morning #Executive #simple #coincidence
