The Court of Cassation in Abu Dhabi upheld the death sentence of an Emirati young man for premeditated and premeditated murder of his father. He sustained injuries that cost his life, and he also deliberately damaged his brother’s car by crashing it into his vehicle to prevent him from aiding the victim.
The facts of the case are that the accused was constantly asking for money from the victim and beating him in order to get that, while his father sometimes gave him and prevented him from others, knowing that the accused used that money to buy psychotropic substances, and he had previously been sentenced in a case of drug abuse. Drugs, where he was deposited for treatment of addiction in one of the therapeutic clinics.
On the day of the incident, the accused lured the victim to the courtyard of the house under the pretext of talking to him, and as soon as he approached him at an appropriate distance, he stabbed him 36 times with a sharp scalpel in different parts of his body, and when the accused’s brother saw the incident from the balcony of his room, he rushed to the hall of the house, trying to move his father He drove his ambulance to help him, but the accused rammed his brother’s car until it became unable to move, while the second brother, who was outside, informed the police after hearing the sound of his father’s screaming while talking to him on the mobile phone. The victim’s brother also attended and took him to the hospital. hospital, but he was dead.
The Public Prosecution had referred the accused to the Criminal Court, on charges of premeditated and premeditated murder, and the accusation of deliberately damaging his brother’s vehicle by hitting it with his vehicle knowing that the victim was inside, in order to prevent him from being rescued and completing the crime, in addition to accusing him of using psychotropic substances in other than authorized cases. legally.
In its pleading before the court, the Public Prosecution requested the imposition of the maximum penalty on the accused, and considered that the fact that the victim was the accused’s father was an aggravating factor for the punishment, so that the court would issue a death sentence, after the blood parents insisted on seeking retribution.
The Court of Cassation in Abu Dhabi upheld the death sentence of an Emirati young man for premeditated and premeditated murder of his father. He sustained injuries that cost his life, and he also deliberately damaged his brother’s car by crashing it into his vehicle to prevent him from aiding the victim.
The facts of the case are that the accused was constantly asking for money from the victim and beating him in order to get that, while his father sometimes gave him and prevented him from others, knowing that the accused used that money to buy psychotropic substances, and he had previously been sentenced in a case of drug abuse. Drugs, where he was deposited for treatment of addiction in one of the therapeutic clinics.
On the day of the incident, the accused lured the victim to the courtyard of the house under the pretext of talking to him, and as soon as he approached him at an appropriate distance, he stabbed him 36 times with a sharp scalpel in different parts of his body, and when the accused’s brother saw the incident from the balcony of his room, he rushed to the hall of the house, trying to move his father He drove his ambulance to help him, but the accused rammed his brother’s car until it became unable to move, while the second brother, who was outside, informed the police after hearing the sound of his father’s screaming while talking to him on the mobile phone. The victim’s brother also attended and took him to the hospital. hospital, but he was dead.
The Public Prosecution had referred the accused to the Criminal Court, on charges of premeditated and premeditated murder, and the accusation of deliberately damaging his brother’s vehicle by hitting it with his vehicle knowing that the victim was inside, in order to prevent him from being rescued and completing the crime, in addition to accusing him of using psychotropic substances in other than authorized cases. legally.
In its pleading before the court, the Public Prosecution requested the imposition of the maximum penalty on the accused, and considered that the fact that the victim was the accused’s father was an aggravating factor for the punishment, so that the court would issue a death sentence, after the blood parents insisted on seeking retribution.
The Court of Cassation in Abu Dhabi upheld the death sentence of an Emirati young man for premeditated and premeditated murder of his father. He sustained injuries that cost his life, and he also deliberately damaged his brother’s car by crashing it into his vehicle to prevent him from aiding the victim.
The facts of the case are that the accused was constantly asking for money from the victim and beating him in order to get that, while his father sometimes gave him and prevented him from others, knowing that the accused used that money to buy psychotropic substances, and he had previously been sentenced in a case of drug abuse. Drugs, where he was deposited for treatment of addiction in one of the therapeutic clinics.
On the day of the incident, the accused lured the victim to the courtyard of the house under the pretext of talking to him, and as soon as he approached him at an appropriate distance, he stabbed him 36 times with a sharp scalpel in different parts of his body, and when the accused’s brother saw the incident from the balcony of his room, he rushed to the hall of the house, trying to move his father He drove his ambulance to help him, but the accused rammed his brother’s car until it became unable to move, while the second brother, who was outside, informed the police after hearing the sound of his father’s screaming while talking to him on the mobile phone. The victim’s brother also attended and took him to the hospital. hospital, but he was dead.
The Public Prosecution had referred the accused to the Criminal Court, on charges of premeditated and premeditated murder, and the accusation of deliberately damaging his brother’s vehicle by hitting it with his vehicle knowing that the victim was inside, in order to prevent him from being rescued and completing the crime, in addition to accusing him of using psychotropic substances in other than authorized cases. legally.
In its pleading before the court, the Public Prosecution requested the imposition of the maximum penalty on the accused, and considered that the fact that the victim was the accused’s father was an aggravating factor for the punishment, so that the court would issue a death sentence, after the blood parents insisted on seeking retribution.
The Court of Cassation in Abu Dhabi upheld the death sentence of an Emirati young man for premeditated and premeditated murder of his father. He sustained injuries that cost his life, and he also deliberately damaged his brother’s car by crashing it into his vehicle to prevent him from aiding the victim.
The facts of the case are that the accused was constantly asking for money from the victim and beating him in order to get that, while his father sometimes gave him and prevented him from others, knowing that the accused used that money to buy psychotropic substances, and he had previously been sentenced in a case of drug abuse. Drugs, where he was deposited for treatment of addiction in one of the therapeutic clinics.
On the day of the incident, the accused lured the victim to the courtyard of the house under the pretext of talking to him, and as soon as he approached him at an appropriate distance, he stabbed him 36 times with a sharp scalpel in different parts of his body, and when the accused’s brother saw the incident from the balcony of his room, he rushed to the hall of the house, trying to move his father He drove his ambulance to help him, but the accused rammed his brother’s car until it became unable to move, while the second brother, who was outside, informed the police after hearing the sound of his father’s screaming while talking to him on the mobile phone. The victim’s brother also attended and took him to the hospital. hospital, but he was dead.
The Public Prosecution had referred the accused to the Criminal Court, on charges of premeditated and premeditated murder, and the accusation of deliberately damaging his brother’s vehicle by hitting it with his vehicle knowing that the victim was inside, in order to prevent him from being rescued and completing the crime, in addition to accusing him of using psychotropic substances in other than authorized cases. legally.
In its pleading before the court, the Public Prosecution requested the imposition of the maximum penalty on the accused, and considered that the fact that the victim was the accused’s father was an aggravating factor for the punishment, so that the court would issue a death sentence, after the blood parents insisted on seeking retribution.