Al Ain Court of First Instance ruled to oblige a car dealer to return to a woman 93,000 dirhams, in addition to 5,000 dirhams in compensation for the damages she sustained as a result of his failure to purchase a car for her daughter, and to end all banking procedures related to financing.
In the details, a woman filed a lawsuit against a merchant, demanding that he pay her 93,000 dirhams, and 10,000 dirhams in compensation for the damages, noting that the merchant deluded her that he would clear the procedures for buying a car for her daughter, and transferred him 93,000 dirhams in installments, after which he did not continue. With her, or responding to her communications and evading her, while the defendant did not submit a memorandum to respond to the lawsuit despite being given a sufficient period for that.
The court heard the plaintiff’s witnesses, and the court decided to take the complementary oath to the plaintiff, so she swore to her in the form “I swear by God Almighty that the sums deposited and transferred to the account of the defendant, totaling 93 thousand dirhams, were for the purpose of buying a car, and that the defendant did not fulfill his obligation to deliver the vehicle or return the amount, and that he owed him It is still busy for me with the amount of the claim amounting to 93,000 dirhams, and God is a witness to what I say.”
In the ruling, the court stated that it was established from the papers that the plaintiff transferred sums to the defendant’s account through the transfer and bank deposit attached to the papers, for the purpose of buying a car, and that the latter did not fulfill his obligation to deliver the vehicle or return the amount, and the court completed the evidence of the lawsuit in the plaintiff’s complementary oath, and from Then there will be evidence in the lawsuit that it is entitled to the amount in question, especially since the defendant attended and did not pay the lawsuit with any payment or defense or provide evidence of his acquittal from the amount in question, and then the lawsuit before him is valid and firm, and the plaintiff must respond to her request and the judiciary to the defendant for the aforementioned amount.
The court indicated that the defendant’s mistake was proven by his failure to implement his agreement with the plaintiff to deliver the vehicle or return the amount, and the plaintiff sustained damage represented in the loss of earnings and loss caused to her as a result of not benefiting from the amount. In this amount, it is sufficient to redress all the damages inflicted on it, and the court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 93,000 dirhams, while obligating him to compensate the plaintiff with 5,000 dirhams, and obligated him to pay fees and expenses.
#man #deludes #woman #financing #car #daughter #seizes #thousand #dirhams