Yara case, Bossetti's request rejected. The Gambirasio lawyer: “Common sense and law won”
“The only thing I can say is that common sense and law won. And I say this succinctly, in response to what was commented by the lawyer Claudio Salvagni”. To talk to Affaritaliani.it is Andrea Pezzotta, one of the lawyers of Yara Gambirasio's family, the 13-year-old kidnapped and killed in 2010, for whose murder he was sentenced to life imprisonment in three levels of trial the bricklayer from Mapello Massimo Bossetti, identified after a long investigation and “framed” by the so-called DNA evidence.
Just today, the Supreme Court of Cassation ruled that the request with which Bossetti's lawyers asked to be able to analyze the findings of the investigation which led first to the arrest and then to the conviction was deemed inadmissible. A previous decision by the judges had already established that these could only be viewed but the bricklayer's lawyers, Claudio Salvagni and Paolo Camporini intended to subject the DNA tests and also the young victim's clothing (leggings, briefs, shoes, sweatshirt and jacket) to new tests ).
Yara case, Bossetti's request rejected. The reconstruction of the trial in a book by Bruzzone-Laura Marinaro
“Power always wins – was the harsh reaction of Claudio Salvagni, Bossetti's lawyer – There is something in those findings that we cannot ascertain: there is the answer that Massimo is innocent”. Statements not shared by those representing the interests of the Gambirasio family, but not only that. Having always supported the guilt of the bricklayer from Mapello, there is also Roberta Bruzzoneforensic psychologist and investigative criminologist, author together with Laura Marinaro of the essay “Yara. Autopsy of an investigation” (published by Ugo Mursia Editore, 204 pages, 17 euros). “We didn't expect any kind of different outcome – he commented on Affaritaliani.it Bruzzone himself – We believe that it was a baseless request, therefore rightly rejected. There are no elements that can undermine the accusatory system validated in three levels of judgement. Access to the finds as a reconnaissance was certainly something that could be hypothesized, but access as an analysis is a matter that in the absence of a scenario realistically led to questioning the conviction is totally impossible”. And again: “I don't understand this obstinacy, the case is closed and we hope it really is the last chapter.”
And speaking of chapterswe publish what is theappendix of Bruzzone and Marinaro's book, but which is perhaps one of the more interesting chapters and which also places a plaque on another element often referred to by Bossetti's defence, namely the alleged bad “preservation” of the DNA samples collected.
#Yara #Bossetti39s #request #rejected #Common #sense #won #Case #closed