The truth about the controversial play in Real Madrid vs. Barcelona: VAR audios

The Spanish classic is a match that always generates all kinds of controversies. Real Madrid and Barcelona They are clubs that have fans all over the world and no detail escapes the eyes of the fans.

The controversy continues

This time The classic It was for the 'merengues' who came back, with a goal from Bellingham at 91' and won 3-2 at home. However, the refereeing decisions were also protagonists in the development of the confrontation.

There was something to talk about on the part of the fans of both teams. On the one hand, in the play of the first goal of Christensen, the 'Madridistas' claimed a foul by the Dane on Toni Kross that would invalidate the goal. On the other hand, the 'culés' claim a “phantom goal” from Lamine Yamal.

This last event was the one that ignited the controversy the most.even leading the president of the Blaugrana club to make an institutional video in which he demonstrated his discontent with the refereeing decisions and announced a request to the Referees Committee to obtain recordings of the match.

In the video, Joan Laporta even announces: “If it is confirmed that it was a legal goal, we will ask for a replay of the match.” Which sparked controversy again in the world of football with various reactions and even memes.

The Federation's response

After the video published by FC Barcelona on the networks and in which Joan Laporta spoke as a spokesperson for the fans and the institution, the Spanish Federation published the audios between the assistants and the central referee in the middle of the match.

Regarding the ghost goal, you hear the judges determine if it is a goal or not. Among other things, it is understood that “there is no goal technology” and a call for patience is made. In the voices of those in attendance you can hear the tension that was experienced at the time due to the importance of the match. In addition, it is confirmed that there are not enough cameras to clarify the situation “They don't have any more, we confirm that there are no more cameras, right? to which the center responds: “We are in no hurry, it is a very important decision.”

Finally, it was decided to resume with a corner kick, since in the words of those present there was no ““no evidence that the ball went in.”For now, the controversy continues to grow and there is no counterresponse from the culé team.