The amount of the discount could be linked to the income of the owner who opts for the intervention. In an alternative or mixed formula that still has to be fine-tuned
Rome – The Superbonus could change again. With the arrival of the new center-right government, the never-ending story of one of the economic measures that in recent years has found greater success among Italians it will probably be enriched with a new chapter. Yet another, considering the continuous changes to which the Relaunch decree, which introduced it two years ago, was subjected.
The next step could be a revision of the maxi rate of 110%, the very one that made it the ‘super’ of all building bonuses. The hypothesis on which the tax experts of Fratelli d’Italia are thinking, according to what is learned from internal sources would be to bring it to 60-70%however, making it structural or at least long-term.
The discount could be linked to the property to be restored or to the income of the owner who opts for the intervention. In an alternative or mixed formula that still has to be fine-tuned. Practically, a higher deduction could be applied in the case of renovation of the first home, strictly not luxury, and lower on the second. Or the amount of the bonus could be correlated to the owner’s income, although in this case a distinction should be made, for example, between real income and real estate assets.
However, the goal remains that of continue to encourage the energy transition of buildings with a view to increasing sustainability, the sources explain, specifying that this logic will be the basis of every measure. In fact, if the Superbonus represents the issue to be addressed most urgently – in any case protecting open situations so as not to jeopardize families and businesses already committed – over time all the subject of building bonuses will have to be rearranged, from the facades to the seismabonus.
The sector will continue to be supported, he is assured, but, starting from the real economic repercussions, it will be necessary to try to make the mechanisms more appropriate, also in an effort to “empower” families and businesses.
The 110% revision could find space in the next maneuver, in which a signal should also arrive on the tax wedge. Not by canceling but reducing the citizen’s income, which the center-right would like to redefine as a “more punctual” form of assistance, would in fact create space to extend the two-point cut decided by the Draghi government (at a cost of about 4.5 billion l year) and perhaps also to finance something more.
FdI also has as a stated goal to introduce as soon as possible too the so-called incremental flat tax on additional income compared to the previous year. A measure that is not too difficult to finance, and therefore to be included in the next budget law, considering that it would not create a hole to be covered with new resources, but possibly only a lack of new income.
All to be defined instead the pension chapter. In January 2023, checks are revalued, the cost of which depends on the Ipca index to which they will be linked. The three-month advance that took place in October, by two percentage points, cost about 1.5 billion: if it were kept this way, 6 billion would be needed for a year, but with the unstoppable price rush, the bill should rise and not by little. In the Nadef, planned inflation is in fact forecast at 7.1% this year and 4.3% next year. Then there is the need, far from indifferent, of find an alternative to avoid the return of the Fornero law from 2023.
#Superbonus #idea #tying #tax #return