The judge of the Court of Instruction number 4 of Tarragona has admitted the complaint of the Gimnàstic de Tarragona against the referee Eder Mallo Fernández, who whistled the match against Málaga in which the Andalusian team frustrated its rise to second division with a goal to a few seconds from the end (2-2).
The magistrate understands that “the facts reported in the complaint of Querella possess enough entity to be constitutive, at least indicate, of a crime of documentary falsehood of art. 390.1.1 of the Criminal Code and a crime of corruption in the sport of art. 286 bis ”, as the writing says.
The complaint, advanced by The avant -gardehe maintained – by providing documentary tests, including the recordings made by the Detective Agency of Francisco Marco, Method 3 – that the referee lied when in the arbitration act he assured that he had feared for his physical integrity after the final beep, in his locker room, in his locker room, in The Nou Estadi. For this reason he accuses him of a crime of documentary falsehood.
The insults and threats described by the referee in the minutes were the main argument for the Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) to sanction the Nàstic with the closure of its four games stadium and with a fine of 9,000 euros.
In addition, the Nàstic also accuses the collegiate of corruption in sport by whistling premeditated to favor Malaga and thus ensure its ascent as a second division collegiate, thus quintuplica its annual salary up to 100,000 euros.
Read too
The magistrate considers that there are indications of crime since the letter of the complaint provides evidence of a private investigation carried out by the Nàstiuc. According to the text, “at a dinner prior to the celebration of the party in Tarragona, several Andalusian authorities and the city of Malaga told the owner of the establishment that they had the controlled party and that the only thing that worried them was the reaction of the public” .
In addition, evidence is also estimated as a conversation between the Collegiate Mallo Fernández with a friend at a bar the night before the game, in which the referee said that “at the 3 of the Nástic I have the enrollment taken.” The next day, during the game, he expelled said player in the 63rd minute.
It also recounts in the complaint that during the game “proceeded to show cards to the Nàstic players inexplicably from a regulatory point of view.” As noted, the expert Xavier Estrada Fernández – exarbito and with technical knowledge in the field – could identify “more than thirteen flagrant arbitration errors, including nine actions of the players of Malaga who should have been sanctioned with a yellow card, and others Errors such as the one produced during the extension in the 113: 21 minute, all favoring Malaga. ” The expert adds, also, that the game lasted “irregularly” until Málaga scored a goal getting drawing in the 124th minute, after which the end of the game immediately.
#judge #admits #process #complaint #Nàstic #referee #frustrated #rise
