Isabel Diaz Ayuso and Miguel Angel Rodriguez. This duo tries to escape unscathed from the judicial troubles of Alberto González Amadorpartner of the Madrid president. This man has committed double tax fraud.
Gonzalez Amador He was one of the individuals who took advantage of the mask business during the worst of the pandemic. And the president could have benefited. In this video we tell you that, despite the scandals that threaten the president, she got rid of Casado, sets the pace for the current PP and, furthermore, he Supreme Court charges the state attorney general.
The facts
Alberto González Amador committed two tax crimesas he acknowledged in a letter that his lawyer sent to the Madrid Provincial Prosecutor’s Office on February 2. The objective of recognizing the crimes was to reach an agreement with the Prosecutor’s Office and avoid going to trial. It all starts when the Tax Agency detects strange operations of the Ayuso couple’s companies.
An investigation then begins, which results in the Madrid Autonomous Prosecutor’s Office denouncing González Amador. He accuses him of two crimes of tax fraud and one of document falsification. He admits to these crimes through his lawyer.
The complaint states that he has avoided paying more than 350,000 euros to the Treasury for Corporate Tax. Something he did through a network of false invoices and front companies. This was done in the years 2020 and 2021, in the worst of the pandemic.
González Amador tried to pay less taxes in the midst of the pandemic
The time period is key. González Amador tried to pay less taxes as a result of the increase in turnover that his company Maxwell Cremona carried out during the pandemic. His company acted as an intermediary for FCS Selects Products SLa company that sold masks and gloves, with the Galician company Maper Asesores.
During this period of time he bought a million euro apartment and a luxury car. Ayuso’s partner not only defrauded those 350,000 euros, they also sought to deduct private expenses in those tax years that are being investigated. One of them splashes directly on the president.
González Amador tried to deduce personal expenses corresponding to a vacation with Ayuso. Specifically, the expenses of two vehicles abroad worth more than 1,000 euros. He also tried to deduct expenses such as the purchase of paddle balls, dental floss, toothpaste, deodorant, shampoo or a clock Rolex of 8,000 euros. Let’s now go to the political communication strategy.
Ayuso’s reaction
Since the information came out in the press, Ayuso has carried out the following strategy: victimizing herself and ensuring that everything is a persecution against her orchestrated from Moncloa. This line of attack was used when Pablo Casado He said that Ayuso was able to benefit his brother for a mask contract during the pandemic, through a commission of 300,000 euros. The strategy was to become a victim.
The play went well for Ayuso and Miguel Ángel Rodríguez. Casado was expelled from the leadership of the PP. The party closed ranks with the president, and the new leader, Alberto Núñez Feijóohe avoided—and still avoids—confronting her.
Ayuso tried to “not fall into Sánchez’s trap”
Since then, the feeling that Ayuso marks the step for Feijóo has increased. The last episode is clear. In a meeting of presidents of communities and autonomous cities of the PP, Ayuso tested “not falling into Sánchez’s trap” and avoid bilateral meetings. Ayuso believes that he will try to “bribe them one by one.”
This statement generated discomfort among PP leaders who do not want to break the institutional dialogue with the President of the Government.
Then in the diary The WorldFeijóo said at the beginning of September that it would be “a mistake” not to attend a meeting with the President of the Government. Barely a month later, Ayuso resigns from going to Moncloa.
Therefore, it not only distances itself from Feijóobut of all the regional presidents of the PP, who do defend going to the meeting with the President of the Government. Ayuso benefits internally, but also from outside.
The attorney general, accused
Alberto González Amador filed a complaint against members of the Prosecutor’s Office for revealing secrets. The Supreme Court decided to charge the attorney general Alvaro Garcia Ortiz. This represents a setback for the Government and an oxygen bomb for Ayuso.
A decision, that of the Supreme Court, criticized by some judges. Left-wing parties have closed ranks with the prosecutor. The most critical believe that the Supreme Court has come out in defense of Ayuso. Let’s go back to the facts. Why has García Ortiz been charged?
When the news of Ayuso’s partner broke out, his chief of staff, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, spread a hoax that the newspaper published The World. The headline stated the following: The Prosecutor’s Office offers Ayuso’s partner an agreement to admit two tax crimes while prosecuting the case.
The Madrid Prosecutor’s Office denied the hoax
MAR’s intention was to present Ayuso’s partner as the victim of political blackmail. That is, he recognized the crimes in exchange for a pact. However, it was the other way around. In the face of false information, The Madrid Prosecutor’s Office issued a statement in which he explains that the lawyer for Ayuso’s couple, the lawyer Carlos Neirawas the one who acknowledged the crimes and tried to reach an agreement.
Before the Prosecutor’s Office published this note, several media outlets, such as Cadena Ser, published an email that supported the Prosecutor’s version.
This is what is important. The Supreme Court has charged the State Attorney General, Alvaro Garcia Ortizalready the chief prosecutor of Madrid, Pilar Rodríguez Fernández.
The Supreme Court does not investigate the note from the Prosecutor’s Office, but rather the emails between the defense of Ayuso’s partner and the Public Ministry. These emails were leaked before and they discard – it must be emphasized – the hoax of Miguel Angel Rodriguez.
Still, the investigation has obstacles along the way. The first is that one of the messages arrived to a generic email and has been in the hands of up to 30 people. The second is that journalists can benefit from the right of professional secrecy and not reveal their sources. Therefore, do not report who leaked the email.
Isabel Diaz Ayuso and Miguel Angel Rodriguez They manage to muddy the public debate, diverting the scandals that threaten the president. The chief of staff spreads hoaxes and threatens journalists. And the president spreads a speech full of hate while playing the victimization card.
#AyusoMAR #tandem #attorney #generals #accusation #setting #pace #Feijóo
