The clarity of an article: interpretative uniqueness
In addition to the complaints of friends, colleagues (in particular two illustrious physicists) I received with amazement the reproaches of those who found a way to contact me, further demonstrating that in democraticissima Italyhas once again taken the path of single and wrong thinking.
Mattarella, Draghi, Enrico Letta and Speranza they hastened to “not turn their backs on the other side”, sending weapons to Zelensky (we could call Griilowscy) an action immediately branded by Putin, and rightly, together with the sanctions, as an act of war against the Russia. And immediately woe to anyone who raises doubts about the interpretative uniqueness ofArticle 11 of our Constitution. We are back in Mattarella who allowed himself to talk about “scientific drift”, for the critics of the single thought of the scientist director Speranza and doubly out of turn: for the occasion, inauguration of the Academic Year 2021/2022, at Sapienza and as a greeting and comment on the speech of the Nobel Prize Parisi who had talked about everything, except how to fight Covid.
Now we are accused, equivalent, of anti-constitutional drift, for those who raise doubts on the government’s interpretation of art. 11 of the Constitution. Accusation that has prompted several almost to offend me, read my article of 5/3.
I also clarify for those who thought the same thing and did not write to me to challenge me.
Premise. I noticed that the boredom of the chronically bored, in perennial search for new emotions, possibly more and more “strong”, pushes to propose in boxing, encounters between highs and lows between whales and penguins. There are basses that, in order to earn, are filled with blows, fake or real. Meetings are proposed between men and women. With the confusion existing here, they could be fake women, but it doesn’t matter. The emotion of novelty seems to be garahtita in matches where kicks are also used, between very tall women and the usual short men, who are kept at a distance by very long kicking legs. Results, see first.
Match in words, for example, between the cultural heavyweight Ernesto Preatoni and the ignorant in the wild, senator grillina Barbara Lezzi that, following the wind and sun setting of the unconscious Conte (dazed, for not being able to stop talking even at night, to the point of not having time for a minimum documentation on the huge and tragic energy problem). Who organized the match (Giletti?), Will have enjoyed the predictable level of the arguments: all resolved face to face, with the entrepreneur who, having lost all inhibitions, played one more real than the other: “she is unable to hold a debate on the subject, what has she done in life? The waitress?“
reaction to the punch in the face, on the mouth “She doesn’t know who I am! I was voted and elected! I’m not here to be offended!“” It must have been voted for by ignorant people like you! “Another punch in the mouth, well justified. Replies with lightning eyes” Cafone, I no longer speak to people like you. She sucks me! “” I spare her my opinions about her ”
End of the match, due to a technical knockout.
Premise, to say that meetings between heavyweights and midges should be avoided, even in debates. But the bored audience wants blood!
So for meetings considered at a higher level: Gianni Riotta (word maker) and Ugo Mattei (jurist). Mattei, who wanted to make the famous, dutiful, but useless in Italy, distinguished between ideological no-vax, contrary to any type of vaccine and a no-these experimental vaccines, received only provocative laughter from the professional word maker, that is, deliberately ramshackle. Four-jawed laughter and laughter, brazenly flaunted. The lawyer, very polite, tried to argue and Riotta, who seemed really drunk, was missing only the hip … hip … and some nice burps ….
Public meetings should only be organized between weights of the same category, otherwise you risk ending up in the equestrian circus. End of premise.
The method, tested and very effective, to verify if the‘art. 11 is written unequivocally clearlyso as to appear well in the most beautiful Constitution in the world:
constitutionalists who are full university professors (the highest level), belong to the category of constitutional heavyweights.
Logical-mathematical-legal clarity is not democratic: it cannot be put to a vote.
If there are constitutional heavyweights who give different and even opposite interpretations, as in the case ofart.11there is no question: the form used, not being uniquely interpreted, is to be reviewed.
AND Mattarella, the guarantor of the Constitution, dragged us into wargiving Article 11 a convenient interpretation, to help the grillini continue to do damage abroad.
Read also:
Government, Draghi ready to resign. Elections in June or September
Government, only Putin’s military invasion avoids the crisis
Ukrainian War, Picierno (Pd): “The EU needs a voice and a single army”
“Rai, inappropriate attacks on Innaro. Does it still make sense to connect with Moscow?”
Ukraine, the collection of goods starts. The points with trucks and volunteers in Milan
Russia-Ukraine war, even Generali leaves Moscow. Stop of Toyota and VW
Fabrizio Corona is ready to fight in Ukraine and “die in glory”
Third World War: Giulietto Chiesa had foreseen everything two years ago
Cryptosmart, here are two services to use bitcoins in real life
BPER Banca, in support of Cattolica students
FS Italiane Group: Trenitalia presents “Blues”, its first hybrid train
#Mattarella #guarantor #Constitution #dragged #war