Pushed forward by the ring on his finger that the stupid and primitive gave him ecuadorian government with the police-military invasion in the mexican embassy and the successful international condemnationhe President López Obrador changed his initial opinion on Sunday's debate from one day to the next, radically and wrongly.
They asked him on Monday if he had seen it and he responded:
“Yes I saw the debate. She was very good, quite good, and that's what I can say.” She said that she saw him at the Manzanillo hotel where she stayed and that he found her “interesting” because she made him remember the debates in which she participated.
–Did you meet the expectations you had in the exchange of ideas? -They Asked.
“I can't talk about that,” he answered, recognizing it as one of the “necessary, important exercises” and exalting it:
“It is what the INE planned and the format that is decided has to be respected (…). “And well, everything is calm, everything is fine, very well…”
Well, one of two: either he had not seen it (although yesterday, Wednesday, he repeated that he saw it on Sunday in Mazatlán), or he saw it until Monday because on Tuesday, interfering again in what he is prohibited from doing, he judged that what he had considered to be very bad? “requetebien” and downloaded:
“In all the narrative of the debate, in the entire narrative of the debate! We talked about what our adversaries maintain about the means of manipulation. The entire narrative of the debate was that: not recognizing absolutely anything (…). What they used to ask the questions (was) with a supposed consultation of all citizens, leaving the drivers the privilege of choosing what questions to ask…”
He ironized: “how bad our health is! without recognizing absolutely anything. How bad in education! How bad in everything…!”, and reproached him for not being recognized for “what has been done in the fight against corruption. “They were not able to make distinctions, everything was a clean slate…”
Do you believe that the debate is awards either recognitions to the 4t?
Of the questions, he recalled “one from Denise: 'How can we confront the great corruption that persists, which comes from I don't know what government, but there it is?' As if we were equal…!”
Someone should tell him that it was not Denise, but the citizens, who asked questions about what interests them most.
“How can we not be different? Here I would go on giving examples. Hopefully Denise will be able to do an analysis to differentiate…”
Skip what you should know:
The moderators Denise Maerker and Manuel López San Martín were given 108 questions selected by randomness and frequency, derived from 24 thousand, formulated on the digital platform designed by the INE and processed by the non-partisan Interdisciplinary Laboratory of the Western Institute of Technology and Higher Studies Signa Lab. And of the 108, the journalists chose the 30 that they considered most relevant, as agreed by the representatives of the INE and the political parties… including that of the president.
@CarlosMarin_soy
More from the same author:
- Israel demanded the same as AMLO
- Mexico bad, but Ecuador much worse
- Ecuador made the aggressor a victim
#awards #ritual
