The members of the PRI Parliamentary Group They do not accompany and will vote in against the reform that puts the National Guard in the hands of the Army, because it violates the Security System and the National Defense System becomes weak, since a good part of its personnel will be dedicated, so to speak, to the police, generating a double impact.
After explaining the above, on behalf of the PRI, the parliamentary coordinator Rubén Moreira Valdez demanded that the government suspend the discussion, wait for the new president, look at the places where there are success stories and dialogue with the governors, while calling on the state leaders to assume their responsibility.
“We are convinced that this country needs a security project and a clear idea of how to achieve peace,” the congressional leader stressed, then pointing out that Morena is lying when it presumes that homicides have decreased, when it is observed that in the last three six-year terms there have been 500 thousand homicides, of which 200 thousand occurred during the current government.
In the Tribune, when positioning herself for the tricolor bench, federal deputy Lorena Piñón asserted that Your parliamentary group cannot be complicit in this institutional dismantling disguised as a security strategy.
He urged people to work on strengthening civil institutions, improving the social conditions that generate violence, and building a Mexico where peace and security are the result of a just society and a strong rule of law, not of military omnipresence.
After questioning the willingness of the majority of the ruling party to be the generation of politicians that handed over public security in Mexico to the military, he warned that this proposal not only ignores the lessons of our history, but also puts both the armed forces and the civilian population at risk.
He complained about the kind of message being sent to the world that Mexico is incapable of maintaining security without resorting to permanent militarization and that its civil institutions are so weak that they must be handed over to military control.
Piñón Rivera recalled that the creation of the National Guard in 2019 was an act of good faith, an attempt by all political forces to address the security crisis, but what is happening today, he said, is a betrayal of that spirit of collaboration.
He stressed that this reform leaves crucial questions unresolved, as it does not specify how a militarized National Guard will be monitored, what will happen with jurisdiction in cases of abuses against civilians, or how it will be guaranteed that trust between the population and the security forces is not eroded.
“This reform not only contradicts the agreements we reached in 2019 and 2022, but represents a step backwards. Those who are in favor of this will make another bad decision that will further disfigure the face of security in Mexico for generations,” he said.
At the beginning of the session, the federal deputy Samuel Palma Cesar presented a suspensive motion to not discuss the ruling on the reform of the National Guard because it violates Article 1 of the Constitution, as well as resolutions and judgments of the American Convention on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
The PRI legislators presented 43 reservations to the ruling, among which Moreira Valdez proposed that, in times of peace, no military authority may exercise more functions than those that have an exact connection with military discipline; strengthen the institutional capacities of state and municipal police forces; as well as prepare semiannual reports on the use of the National Guard in public security actions, with quantifiable and verifiable indicators.
- Haven’t you checked out Amazon? Check out THIS LINK their best products
#Federal #deputies #PRI #vote #militarizing #National #Guard
