Former deputy Íñigo Errejón has assured that the complaint by actress Elisa Mouliaá is “false” and has asked the judge investigating her for sexual assault to reopen the case and allow her to testify to “expose the reality of the facts.” So, has criticized the “procedural limbo” in which he has been plunged after the interruption of the case due to the pregnancy of the complainant’s lawyer.
In his appeal, the former parliamentary spokesperson for Sumar addresses Court Number 47 of Madrid and subsidiarily to the Provincial Court of Madrid. In the text he criticizes what he considers a “stratagem and trick” to delay and delay the processing of the procedure, “with evident bad faith and abuse of rights” by Mouliaá’s lawyer.
It was this same Monday when Judge Adolfo Carretero agreed to temporarily archive the case until the lawyer returned from her medical leave. The judge explained in his ruling that Mouliaá “has refused to appoint another lawyer to replace her trust” therefore “the inevitable consequence is the impossibility of continuing the procedure.”
Errejón’s lawyer urges the magistrate to reopen the case so that he can “declare as soon as possible.” Furthermore, it demands that the actress be required to “Within a maximum period of 24 hours, appoint a new lawyer you trust” who can immediately take charge of your legal representation.
In this context, his defense recalls that this case is not “a civil procedure” but one “exceptionally high-profile criminal case, in which serious conduct is charged”. Thus, he states that with each passing day he cannot “give the proper explanations before the investigating body, to the public detriment of his honor and his right to the presumption of innocence.”
“Therefore, and also given the exceptional media significance of the process, respect for the procedural rights that protect Mr. Errejón must be no less exceptional. avoid serious undue delays What does the lawyer intend until her reinstatement in more than 16 weeks? March or April 2025?” he asks.
“Bad faith is undoubtedly”
His lawyer emphasizes that Errejón’s “desire” was to testify in court last Tuesday, as planned: “In order to be able to offer the corresponding explanations before the judicial body and expose the reality of the facts, which are far from those described by Mouliaá in his false complaint, and which may be distorted by the evidentiary proceedings carried out throughout the investigation phase”.
Errejón’s representation ensures that “intend to extend this unprecedented and unprecedented procedural limbo agreed by the instructor, and in which “the former deputy” remains “for at least four more months, is legally and humanly unacceptable.” “The bad faith is undoubted; and the abuse of rights, indisputable,” he adds.
In the opinion of his defense, the order by which the judge agreed to archive the case is “legally incomprehensible and procedurally incongruous”. “Since the representation or the medical leave or pregnancy” of Mouliaá’s lawyer were not duly accredited, “he required to appoint another lawyer he trusted or someone to replace the physically incapacitated lawyer in order to safeguard the rights of the person under investigation.”
#Errejón #accuses #Mouliáa #filing #false #complaint #asks #testify #expose #reality #facts
