The Dana judge rejected the diligence requested by the popular accusation that Cultural Acció of the Valencià country (ACPV) on the data related to the movements of the official vehicle of President Carlos Mazón on the day of the ravine. The instructor concluded, in a car on March 17, that the requested diligence was “destined for the research” of Mazón, who holds the condition of Afforado. Only if the Chief of the Consell had voluntarily accepted the invitation to declare as investigated, the instructor could assess the relevance of the diligence on the official car. And Mazón, the judge recalled, “has refused said offer.” However, the popular accusation has resorted to the car arguing that it is a diligence that “clearly” would not cause defenseless defense. ACPV’s legal representation recalls that the president, according to the Transparency Law, “has the duty to report his work agenda.”
“The use of official vehicles by the members of the Consell, as well as the high positions of the government, is perfectly regulated and its use must be public knowledge,” says the appeal of the popular accusation to which this newspaper has had access. If the citizens have the “unavoidable right” to obtain such data, and even to go to the Transparency Council or the administrative contentious route in case of opacity, “it is meaningless that an instruction court, which investigates acts of extreme gravity, could not access data of extraordinary relevance,” abounds the letter.
The two opposition groups in the Corts Valencianes (PSPV-PSOE and Compromís) requested the movements of the official Mazón cars. However, the Valencian Executive just deliver the diets (and not the parts of the vehicles).
The popular accusation ensures that this diligence would not involve any defenselessness for the aforementioned Carlos Mazón. “The key,” the resource argues, “is to exhaust the instruction of everything that does not cause helplessness of the aforementioned person.”
“Information is requested that must be public, which is related to the use of public goods, in the exercise of public functions, without any helplessness being generated in a public office that has a legally established obligation, of transparency in its institutional activities,” adds ACPV.
The appeal also refers to an article by the Transparency Law on “emergency situations or serious collective risk”, which forces high positions to “disseminate without delay” the information available “in case of imminent threats to human health” or the environment. “Just what the Afforado did not do, or the people investigated [en referencia a la exconsellera Salomé Pradas y el exsecretario autonómico Emilio Argüeso]nor those that could be after the advances of the instruction, ”says the popular accusation.
The “passivity” of Pradas and argues before the Dana
ACPV also requested the same proceedings about the official vehicles of the then Department Salome Pradas and its regional secretary Emilio Argüeso, both accused of the case. “It does not appear,” argued the judge, “neither is affirmed by the representation of the Cultural Acción of the Valencià country, that they would not have joined the Cecopi meeting or that said incorporation had been carried out late.”
On the contrary, the appeal of the popular accusation recalls that both Pradas and Argüeso held the maximum responsibility – “only below the president” – in the “prevention, management and resolution” of a “hydrological emergency that was declared on October 24” and whose “passivity on the 24th, 25, 26, 27, 28 and, especially, October 29, caused very important personal damage.”
“It is incomprehensible that the Cecopi meeting [Centro de Coordinación Operativa Integrado] It would be convened at such a late hour, knowing that in other events of much less entity, several days before meetings were held to study the possible scenarios of adverse weather events, adopting the appropriate preventive measures, ”says the writing.
ACPV recalls that Salome Pradas and Emilio Argüeso “not only participated in the Cecopi in the most relevant role, at least in the absence of the president, physically or telematically, but one and the other were the top leaders” of the Autonomic Department of Emergencies “from their inauguration.”
A “responsibility”, affirms the popular accusation, that “it was inherent to its people and that, both in their respective offices, in their institutional visits, in their official cars or in their homes, they continued to be and maintaining the operational capacity to adopt legally planned decisions, telephone, via message, transmitting verbal orders, requiring reports [o] electronically signing documents. “” Before, during and after Cecopi himself, “the writing adds.
Thus, ACPV reiterates the request for “essential” proceedings on the movements of the official cars of the ex -conssellera and former autonomous secretary, the exit and return hours to the mobile park of the drivers and the possible diets.
#accusation #Dana #case #wields #Transparency #Law #Judge #Data #official #Mazón #car
