The ERC candidates are cast in six positions in the decisive debate prior to the party congress

Four days before the vote to decide the leadership of ERC in the framework of the 30th National Congress of the party, the three candidates for the presidency have been cast in the six proposals in a debate celebrating the national flag in Barcelona. The event, more than an exchange of ideas or replies between rivals, has served to reinforce the speeches of each candidacy, showing a lack of initial interaction.

Oriol Junqueras, from Militància Decidim, has given a blow to “save ERC“And he has detailed measures to promote a prosperous Catalonia. For his part, Xavier Godàs, of Nova Esquerra Nacional, has advocated for starting a new stage with one Renewed leadership that prioritizes a solid political project The gaze is focused on the municipal elections of 2027. Helena Solà, from Foc Nou, has been especially critical of the management of the previous executive, highlighting thestructure B shadow I promise to end both the “vassallatge” to the PSC.

The debate, moderated by the party’s deputy secretary of communication, Oriol Duran, has been structured in various blocks. The candidates have expressed the reasons why they will preside over ERC, the differences between the other candidates, as they hope to regain the confidence of the militancy and who will be the first action if they are escollits.

Junqueras focuses his speech on militancy

Junqueras, the candidate with the most endorsements, has placed emphasis on them reptes that affect the countrywith the poverty, the escalation of the traveler’s prices, the quality of the public services and the million of the infrastructures. According to him, the party must prioritize “effective political actions” and reconnect both sectors with the pages and the workers, who consider the darrers anys untidy.

This strategy has served Junqueras to avoid criticism about the B structure and direct questions about his vote in the consultation for the investiture of Salvador Illa. Tanmateix, Helena Solà has launched a frontal attack, stating that “it is not possible to accuse Illa of being a delegate of the Moncloa during the campaign and, afterward, lliura-li the Generalitat’s class.” Solà has also denounced the lack of coherence of the part I have assured that independence parking is the main cause of the loss of support in the darrers anys.

Solà i Godàs demands responsibilities

The only presidential candidate has defended himself to recover the confidence of the militància cal “fer net“and “recover the pride of relevance.” He has announced that, if he does, he will hire an audit to clarify the internal issues, while Junqueras has proposed the creation of a Truth Commission. The Foc Nou candidate has also underlined the There is total opposition to agreeing with the PSC, which he considers incompatible with the values ​​of the party.

Godàs, for his part, has pressured Junqueras because he revealed whether he will donate support to Illa, now that he has promised to assume responsibilities in any situation, “whether good, bad or average”, if he leads the game. Regarding structure B, he has challenged the lack of transparency and has highlighted the need for a clear separation between the Government and the internal organization of ERC.

Junqueras has tried to divert attention, stating that it is only considered responsible for the part “who had full capacity”in reference to the period that the prisoner will spend. This week’s event has revealed that during its venture in Lledoners it will receive more than 500 visits.

A debate between menys toilets and waiting rooms

All the disagreements, the debate has resulted more conciliatory than expected. Junqueras has invited the rest of the candidates to work together to recompose the part, while Godàs has proposed to collaborate in the writing of a political paper. The main differences have been found in points with the He related to the PSC and the need for internal regeneration, both Solà maintains an inflexible stance and Godàs opts for a more pragmatic direction.

In short, the debate has reflected a divided ERC, with conflicting visions but with a common denominator: the need to regain the confidence of the militancy and rebuild the party’s political project to face future challenges.