For my churri and for Porriño. Isabel Díaz Ayuso has clear her priorities. He prefers to be in O Porriño, in Galicia, on Friday rather than in Moncloa standing up to the evil Pedro Sánchez. The economic and institutional interests of the Community of Madrid are not above its status as a battering ram of the right against the Government and the left in general. And then there is the most important thing, the personal factor. Where the obligation to pay taxes does not come, love comes.
O Porriño made headlines a few weeks ago for an illegal vehicle race in an industrial estate in which even a hearse participated. That surreal (and illegal) touch defines recent Spanish politics quite well at a time when everyone does what they want, including some courts. We have to wait until January to see if it is possible to agree on the budgets with which the legislature would begin a certain path of normality, which is not convenient for the opposition. In the meantime, it’s better to settle for killing time with the usual mud fights.
Ayuso had already tried to get the regional presidents of the PP not to accept the invitation. He does not consider them very smart or did not trust them, because he assumed that Sánchez was going to try to deceive or “bribe” them. Almost all of them used the dilemma to give more weight to the interests of their region than those of their party, an idea that always works with voters.
The beginning of the round of talks confirmed that the meeting was as necessary as it was anodyne. The central and regional governments should have relations of institutional respect for the functions of each administration. Nor will a meeting serve to normalize a dialogue conditioned by the terrible relations between the PSOE and the PP.
Díaz Ayuso’s boycott of the meeting can be understood as an implicit criticism of Alberto Núñez Feijóo and all the other barons who did agree to go to Moncloa. “If a regional president does not go to the Moncloa Palace, I think he makes a mistake,” said the PP leader in September. Even for someone like Feijóo, changing his mind so quickly would be ridiculous. He cannot retract his opinion, although he cannot allow himself to directly criticize Ayuso either.
Therefore, it is time to strike a balance. “We are an institutional party and the paradigm of institutionality is Alberto Núñez Feijóo,” said Borja Sémper on Monday, “a man who respects the norm, the form and who also believes in that institutionality that must be preserved.” Come on, institutionality comes out of the pores. That will not bother the Madrid president. It helps you distinguish yourself. She has not gotten to where she is with respect for institutions as a flag. His thing is more the knife blow to Sánchez’s spleen.
In the dynamic of revenge in which she finds herself, Ayuso does not tolerate maintaining official relations with someone who has attacked her boyfriend. The family, above all, although sharing a fortune worth a million euros should not be ignored either.
Sánchez called Alberto González Amador a “confessed criminal” in Brussels for the two tax crimes that his lawyer acknowledged in February. After a while of waiting to see what would come of the case, the socialists went all in. Moncloa decided that it would respond to Ayuso with its own weapons, after the Madrid PP announced that it was going to summon Begoña Gómez to testify in an investigative commission in the Assembly dedicated to her work at the Complutense University. The same thing Feijóo said he would prefer not to do in the Senate.
In 2024, the Government’s ban on shooting Ayuso in the same way she does with others was lifted. “It has turned the Community of Madrid into the epicenter of mud and corruption,” Óscar López said on Monday. “Ayuso is a toxic contribution to our coexistence and to our society,” commented the other Óscar (Puente) with whom he forms the limited company to stoke the PP always and everywhere. The Minister of Transport had already called her a “mediocre and untrained person” a few months ago.
The president of Madrid has never been in favor of unilateral disarmament, but rather of preventive attacks. In the Madrid Assembly, Ayuso accused the Government of using “mafia practices” last week. It cannot be denied that he adds imagination to the matter coming from someone who has Miguel Ángel Rodríguez on his payroll.
A frequently repeated tactic is to present yourself as a victim. “They have called me a murderer, a genocidal person, a crazy person, a corrupt person,” she said on Monday. The list of names that she dedicates to the left is not small. The latest product of their idea factory is that the left promotes drug consumption to have a submissive and impoverished society.
He has always dedicated more intensity to attacking his rival than to defending his own convictions. With the first, your creativity It is overflowing. With the second, generalities and promises, sometimes repeated, are valid.
Ayuso is scandalized by the now constant references from the socialists about her boyfriend’s crimes. It is debatable that a president of the Government would dedicate himself to attacking the partner of a regional president for alleged illegal acts carried out without her consent. It is better understood if it is analyzed, not as a defense of the Tax Agency, but as a way of paying for the attacks on Begoña Gómez with the same currency. It is the last Spanish contribution to democracy. Spouses are now acceptable ammunition in combat. There are so many vendettas afoot that it’s hard to keep up with them all.
“They try to destroy me emotionally,” Ayuso said. As if that were new in her and Rodríguez’s plans towards their adversaries.
#AyusoSánchez #time #personal #reality #personal
