Construction|According to the documents submitted by the buyers to the district court, the detached house is sinking and repairing it would be equivalent to building a new house. The house reporter denies the claims.
The summary is made by artificial intelligence and checked by a human.
A detached house has been built in Espoo, which the buyers consider to be in a state of disrepair.
According to the buyers, the house is sinking. They want to cancel the deal due to numerous mistakes.
The district court ordered the confiscation of the house supplier’s property for 550,000 euros.
The house supplier denies the alleged errors and considers that he has delivered a house according to the contract.
Espoo a new detached house has gone up in the value area of Tapiola, which the buyers think is fit for demolition. According to the buyers, there are numerous faults in the house, which is why they want to cancel the deal.
The details of the case appear in public documents obtained by HS. The dispute is pending in the district court of Länsi-Uusimaa.
Court documents reveal that the nearly 500,000-euro detached house was built on a turnkey basis and was delivered by Den Finland, a company that builds small houses.
The buyers demand that the district court order the confiscation of the house supplier’s property for 550,000 euros.
The district court agreed to the request in the summer. According to the court, there was a risk that the company would hide, destroy or give away its assets, in which case the potential claims of the buyers would be at risk.
Buyers’ fear is partly related to the weak situation in the construction industry. The industry has suffered from high interest rates and a decrease in orders. The house supplier’s result has been in the red for a long time, and even large construction companies have been driven into insolvency.
Buyers list several mistakes about the house in the application for safeguarding measures submitted to the district court: the house built on soft clay, among other things, is sinking and some of the pipes and underground wells have changed their shape.
The floors and ridge of the house are said to have unevenness and depressions. Errors and deficiencies have also been reported in, for example, rainwater systems and subgrade space. According to the documents submitted to the court, microbial or mold growth has been observed in some of the structures.
Buyers consider that weather protection has not been adequately taken care of during construction. According to them, about 500 liters of water have had to be removed from inside the hollow tiles.
Correcting the defects in the house would be such a big job that it would be equivalent to rebuilding the house, states the buyers’ protection measures application.
According to the buyers, the house built on soft clay soil is sinking.
House reporter sees it differently in his own statements. It considers that it has delivered its customers a house in accordance with the contract and that it has corrected the usual minor errors revealed during the acceptance inspection.
The building supplier does not recognize the errors claimed by the buyers, this is clear from the subpoena application filed by the company and the response to the buyers’ protection action application.
According to the summons application, the buyers have made “probably hundreds” of complaints about errors in the delivery of the house and left more than 42,000 euros unpaid.
In its subpoena application, the house supplier also appeals to the buyers’ extensive condition survey of the house, which the company’s representatives were unable to inspect.
According to the subpoena application, the building supplier has also not received information about the results of the inspection from the buyers, despite several inquiries.
The district court has not yet made a final decision in the dispute, but the case is still being processed in court.
#Construction #detached #house #worth #million #euros #built #Espoo #demolishable
