Are you going to tell us which Socialist Party, with what principles and with what ideological framework, is going to leave Congress? That’s what they have pending. They have been receiving tugs from here and there for seven years
"I came to perceive how my profile as a human being was blurred and I became a dense, mud-like mass…"
Allow me not to get up, it’s not that I’m in the grave but I’m lying down. The antigens say they don’t give it a name, but some virus has become strong in my bronchi and has me stunned. So I apologize. I am not understanding anything that the media is saying about Seville, about the PSOE, but I already tell you that I have such congestion that it can only be due to my temporary incapacity and not because fantastic phrases and very crazy assertions are being uttered there. .
There is the thing about Zapatero’s 600 years, which, like the hunter, we all exaggerate a little, but perhaps it has gotten out of hand. Without taking away any merit from socialist feminism, the real one, which Pedro Sánchez cornered to please Podemos when it was time to please him, I think the former president has gone a bit too far. Fortunately for the women of this country, it was not only 40 years ago that women were able to access education, neither compulsory nor university, since all of this occurred at the end of the 19th century, a little before Casa Labra. Maybe it’s the fever that blinds me. Even with Franco we girls studied, wow, this has never been Persepolis.
The information is mixed with that of a very inspired Isabel Rodríguez who affirms that the socialists will protect housing policies in the Constitution “when we put an end to the right.” What does it mean to end the right exactly? Sir, I have doubts. I don’t know if in a plural democracy, as all liberal ones are, it is telling us that it will never be able to constitutionally protect housing, given that the right will always be there, or if it is truly presented as a liberating and hopeful horizon that this “end of the right” that would make the regime totalitarian as there was no possibility for conservative citizens to participate in the political game or the alternation that by definition shapes democracy. Surely I have misunderstood or that she has not said what she seems to have said, although it is certain that she has said it. I don’t know, girl, disturbing. Let’s hope we don’t have to start putting it into people’s minds that those on the right have as much right to be right as those on the left have as much right to be left. This was something we were all clear about, wasn’t it?
People keep going up to the red red stage. And Santos Cerdán arrives and somehow responds, that relieves me, when he categorically states: “We represent dialogue, diversity, respect for those who think and feel differently,” and I say to myself, look, this one amends his plan, now You don’t have to kill anyone, you just have to respect them and that’s it. Then, I don’t know why, Lobato comes to mind and I drop the beach bar. And the fact is that if one of your people is a little different, who only differs in nuances, in the leader’s way of doing things, but who upholds your same principles, you have been doing something Roman all the time – to him and to all the others. critics that there are—well, I don’t know, dear, how you are going to respect those who are from outside and think not a little differently, but totally different. Maybe that’s a bit of an end to the right and to an end to those who move where we don’t mark them. I don’t know, don’t listen to me: everything seemed very confusing to me.
As confusing as when he said “they are going to get us”, which was somewhere between epic and self-protective. “There has never been a similar attack on a legitimate president.” Maybe it was very small when the final death rattles of Felipismo and what Cebrián called the crime syndicate were raging, although none of that would have happened without the tremendous cases of corruption and without the suspicions of state terrorism of the GAL. And for there to be mud, you need water… and earthen sediment. That if you only carry clear and singing water through the fountains of your headquarters and your militants, no one can form mud, that the adversaries are not god, that the judges whom you also accuse are not god, that they need you to give them the material to knead you the mud Precisely Cerdán, who knew Ábalos and Koldo so closely, knows what this earthly matter is about, without which they would not have been able to knead the mud of corruption.
So everything. I would buy the ‘kids in the toga take away our snacks and we haven’t done anything’ if it weren’t for the fact that there are indubitable and strange facts. There are high school graduates with an assistant professorship at a public university; The same professionals who are general directors paid with public money do the hard work of asking for money and those unsophisticated things. That’s there. Without that land there would be no mud to form. Without that private lawyer-prosecutor message that is made public so that with the sentence written by a lawyer—two tax crimes have actually been committed—he becomes the “confessed offender” of the story the next day, without that use of the media of the State against the adversary, that is what history is about, there would be no mud to settle either. Not even without brothers who are given generous contracts so that they spend little time at work and live abroad. Without matter there is no substance. Without the minister’s friends hired in public companies with public money there is no ‘mamancy’. All without any explanation beyond the demand of unconditional faith: there is nothing at all and they are coming for us.
I hear them say things and I wonder if they are going to say the decisive ones, the ones that matter. Are you going to tell us which socialist party, with what principles and with what ideological framework, is going to leave Congress? That’s what they have pending. They have been receiving tugs from here and there for seven years: the communists drag them to their barricades and the nationalists to their independence and thus little by little socialism has been losing the profile that made it a port of confidence for many progressive citizens and even for those in the center who saw fangs on the other side; Yes, those people who would never vote for a revolutionary party or a vermilion red one, as demonstrated by the history of Izquierda Unida and its 11% maximum vote during Anguita’s time.
The PSOE was always a party of majorities, while now it is a party shaken by minorities. Are they going to debate how to reverse the damage? Do you think that by turning even more towards the radical left they will recover the sectors of calm progressives who neither want a change of regime nor the abolition of the private sector nor to take to the mountains at this point? Are they going to realize, once and for all, that the PSOE and the PP, both of them, are systemic parties without which Spanish democracy is not possible? Are you aware that people pass, but ideals and ideas must remain, that they are not changed, like the sheets, once a week? Have you noticed that if you destroy confidence in the rule of law to save a few people, you will be killing democracy?
My fever is going to rise, it’s time. I continue to medicate. I hope to be more awake on Sunday when the leader speaks. I don’t know why I feel like he’s going to clarify all my doubts and maybe even Lobato’s. Even with a supreme blow he explains everything and leaves the bad guys without any earthly sediment, so that they cannot knead mud. For hoping it doesn’t stay.
#earth #sediment #attack
