Ciudad Juárez.- Before the Federal Judiciary Council (CJF) determined that the suspension of work could not be indefinite and established October 11 as the fatal date to resume activities in the Judicial Branch (PJF), judges and magistrates in Juárez had voted to maintain the strike until talking with the Executive and Legislature about the reform approved since September 11.
The decision of the heads of the PJF in Ciudad Juárez was informed by an official document, a notice of suspension of deadlines and procedural terms to the public servants of the PJF, litigants, experts and the general public, signed by the coordinator of magistrates residing on this border, María Guadalupe Contreras Jurado, and the coordinator of judges, Ernesto Cornejo Ángeles, a judge from the Federal Criminal Justice Center, the same instance that has accumulated almost 500 canceled hearings, according to the public agendas on their sites. official website.
The notice of this suspension, prior to the determination of the Council, was made on October 3, the days of October 3 and 4 were declared non-working days “due to causes of force majeure, in order for the workers to continue exercising free actions.” manifestation”.
In addition, it was stated that some civil organizations put to a vote at the national level whether to return to work activities. In the particular case of the National Association of Circuit Magistrates and District Judges of the PJF (an organization with the acronym Jufed), the results were 832 votes in favor of not ending the strike. The percentage that this represents of the total number of people consulted is uncertain, since it was not disseminated by the same association.
Another association, the College of Secretaries and Actuaries of the Federal Judiciary, shared on October 2 that more than 4,500 people were consulted, of which 4,094 said that the strike should continue and 596 said not, an 87.3 against 12.7 percent.
The decision of the Judicial Council was divided. The strike continues, but not with the vote of the councilors Eva Verónica de Gyves Zárate or Celia Maya García, or the councilor Bernardo Bátiz Vázquez, who voted against with the argument that the Council “has the function of ensuring public service of the administration of justice.”
What the local judges had said, which was void after what the CJF voted, indicated that an extension of the temporary suspension of work was given “for a date to be determined based on the completion of the real dialogue with the Executive and Legislative Branches.” ”.
#sought #prolong #PJF #strike