The State Public Prosecution clarified, through a tweet that it published today on its accounts on social media, the punishment of those who obliged opponents in a civil matter to swear an oath or responded to him by swearing falsely.
The Public Prosecution indicated that, according to Article 260 of the Federal Penal Code, anyone who obliges litigants in a civil matter to swear an oath or responds to him and makes a false oath shall be punished by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years or a fine not exceeding ten thousand dirhams.
The Public Prosecution clarified that the offender is exempted from punishment if he returns to the truth after taking the false oath and before a ruling is issued on the merits of the case in which the oath was taken.
The dissemination of this information comes within the framework of the State Public Prosecution’s ongoing campaign to enhance the legal culture among members of society, and raise the level of public awareness of the law.
The State Public Prosecution clarified, through a tweet that it published today on its accounts on social media, the punishment of those who obliged opponents in a civil matter to swear an oath or responded to him by swearing falsely.
The Public Prosecution indicated that, according to Article 260 of the Federal Penal Code, anyone who obliges litigants in a civil matter to swear an oath or responds to him and makes a false oath shall be punished by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years or a fine not exceeding ten thousand dirhams.
The Public Prosecution clarified that the offender is exempted from punishment if he returns to the truth after taking the false oath and before a ruling is issued on the merits of the case in which the oath was taken.
The dissemination of this information comes within the framework of the State Public Prosecution’s ongoing campaign to enhance the legal culture among members of society, and raise the level of public awareness of the law.
The State Public Prosecution clarified, through a tweet that it published today on its accounts on social media, the punishment of those who obliged opponents in a civil matter to swear an oath or responded to him by swearing falsely.
The Public Prosecution indicated that, according to Article 260 of the Federal Penal Code, anyone who obliges litigants in a civil matter to swear an oath or responds to him and makes a false oath shall be punished by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years or a fine not exceeding ten thousand dirhams.
The Public Prosecution clarified that the offender is exempted from punishment if he returns to the truth after taking the false oath and before a ruling is issued on the merits of the case in which the oath was taken.
The dissemination of this information comes within the framework of the State Public Prosecution’s ongoing campaign to enhance the legal culture among members of society, and raise the level of public awareness of the law.
The State Public Prosecution clarified, through a tweet that it published today on its accounts on social media, the punishment of those who obliged opponents in a civil matter to swear an oath or responded to him by swearing falsely.
The Public Prosecution indicated that, according to Article 260 of the Federal Penal Code, anyone who obliges litigants in a civil matter to swear an oath or responds to him and makes a false oath shall be punished by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years or a fine not exceeding ten thousand dirhams.
The Public Prosecution clarified that the offender is exempted from punishment if he returns to the truth after taking the false oath and before a ruling is issued on the merits of the case in which the oath was taken.
The dissemination of this information comes within the framework of the State Public Prosecution’s ongoing campaign to enhance the legal culture among members of society, and raise the level of public awareness of the law.