The head of the Court of Instruction number 31 of Madrid, Marcelino Sexmero, has once again rejected the reopening of the investigation into the passage of the vice president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, through the Madrid airport in January 2020 that Vox urged after revealing the Koldo case that the President of the Government was aware that he intended to travel to Spain to spend a few days having access to European territory banned due to sanctions on the Maduro regime. In a resolution notified this Wednesday, the instructor, in line with the criteria of the Prosecutor’s Office, explains that the knowledge of these events by the then Minister of Transportation, José Luis Ábalos, his advisor Koldo García and the commission agent Víctor de Aldama, as well as such as Pedro Sánchez, which Vox points out as “new facts” to request the reopening of the case, has no real relationship with the investigations, which focused on whether or not Delcy Rodríguez had set foot on national territory. He also remembers that the Supreme Court already archived the part of the Delcygate that affected Ábalos while he had met with the Venezuelan woman that night at the airport, concluding that the violation of the European sanction that prevented the Venezuelan woman from entering Spain, of had occurred, that the investigating court concluded that because it remained in a transit zone, it would not have been a crime, since it has no criminal relevance, but rather a political reproach. Related News He says that the competition is standard Interior No The former director of the Barajas Airport was unaware of the arrival of Delcy Rodríguez He defends his actions in the conservation of the recordings, which he guarded until 2022 and assures that he did not make copies. With this premise, the judge reasons that ” It is not possible to understand the relationship that may exist between the present case whose objective was to determine the action in the presence of a Venezuelan politician at the Barajas terminal and the rescue or subsidies to Globalia, an alleged purchase of gold for Bancasa and the intervention of Mr. Koldo and Mr. Aldama without the alleged authorization of the president of that visit having criminal relevance, since that of the minister himself did not have it. In his opinion, “none of these facts have relevance in the present case, the purpose of which was always to determine whether the presence of Delcy Rodríguez in Spanish territory in the early hours of January 20, 2020 was criminal in nature and these alleged facts do not make it criminally “The indicated indications that the Supreme Court already understood to have profiles unrelated to Criminal Law are relevant.” Furthermore, remember that the actions that both Koldo García and Víctor de Aldama could have carried out are already being investigated in the National Court, “where the scope of said events and their criminal relevance will have to be elucidated” and not in the Plaza courts. of Castile.
#judge #rules #reopening #Delcygate #due #Koldo #case #revelations
