On the morning of August 24, López Obrador accused the author of the Political Itinerary of “attacking” his government, for denouncing the illegal persecution against Jesús Murillo.
The truth is that the Mexican president not only lies but also deceives millions of Mexicans, as is his custom.
And to confirm the presidential mythomania, here are the hard facts that show “the historical swineherd” that they resorted to in the Palace to carry out the revenge against the former head of the PGR.
Here we said that the persecution and imprisonment of the former head of the PGR, Jesús Murillo, and the misleading clarification of the crime of “The 43”, is nothing more than a State conspiracy that violates not only the Constitution, but also annuls the Division of Powers and confirms that in Mexico the “Rule of Law” has been degraded to the level of a vulgar revenge of Palacio.
And it is that from a twisted and Manichaean conception of the so-called “Historical Truth” –of the case of “The 43” –, both President Obrador and the Undersecretary of the Interior Alejandro Encinas seem determined to violate the Constitution and the laws that emanate from it and in circumventing basic legal concepts of Criminal Procedure Law.
And Manichaeism begins with the creation of the unconstitutional “Truth Commission”, passing through the supine ignorance of the concept of “Historical Truth” and reaches the extreme of illegal manipulation of the crime of “forced disappearance”.
But let’s go in parts.
1.- The so-called “Historical Truth” is not an occurrence applied to the case of “The 43”, nor is it a temporary slogan, much less an occurrence of the Peña Nieto government.
two.- Actually the “Historical Truth” is a legal concept of Criminal Procedure Law; It is the central objective of any criminal investigation.
3.- And it is that discovering the “Historical Truth” is the fundamental and ultimate purpose of the Public Ministry in the investigation of crimes.
4.- And the best proof of this is that in the specific case of “The 43”, the so-called “Historical Truth” is the same one that both Jesús Murillo and Alejandro Encinas arrived at -each one at his time.
A “Historical Truth” that -in the cases of Murillo and Encinas–, is made up of the following elements, namely:
a). – That the Ayotzinapa students were detained by the municipal police of Iguala and by other authorities.
b). – That they were handed over to a criminal group, presumably Guerreros Unidos and/or Los Rojos.
c). – And that such criminal groups ordered to kill and incinerate them.
5.- By themselves, the facts established in subsections a, b, and c, establish “The Historical Truth” and, curiously -as already said-, it is the same one that Murillo and Encinas arrived at, respectively.
And that’s why you have to ask.
So why do the “Truth Commission” headed by Alejandro Encinas and the attorney general’s office, “mangoneada” by López Obrador, accuse, persecute and imprison Jesús Murillo?
The answer is for everyone to see: The accusation, persecution and imprisonment of Murillo is a revenge ordered by López to force the former head of the PGR to denounce former President Peña Nieto.
Here the evidence of the unconstitutional arrest of Jesús Murillo.
YO). – Article 21 of the Constitution “orders” that the Public Ministry is “the authority” to which the investigation of crimes corresponds.
II). – In this stage of investigation, the Public Ministry issues agreements and determinations; the same as the judges in their matter and competence.
III). – The then Attorney General of the Republic, Jesús Murillo, publicly reported the result of the investigation:
Yo). – In other words, the students were detained by municipal police from Iguala, from other municipalities and other authorities.
ii). – That the police handed over the detainees to the Los Rojos or Guerreros Unidos criminal group.
That such criminal groups deprived them of life and burned them.
IV). – That “Historical Truth” reached by Murillo Karam is found in the investigation file and that determination is not only proof of the crime committed by those responsible prisoners, but also that it produced and continues to produce its legal effects, in a real and current manner.
Therefore, that determination has not changed; has not been modified. It is the basis, the support of the crime committed.
In other words, just like the resolutions of the judges, the determination of the prosecutor, if it was improper, could be challenged by the party affected; That is why the Amparo Trial exists.
But instead of following the judicial procedure, Obrador and his lackeys preferred the constitutional violation shortcut.
As you know, López created the Truth Commission by decree; instance to which it grants powers and resources of the Public Ministry.
A Truth Commission that does not exist in the Constitution and, worse yet, whose powers violate the Magna Carta.
And it is that the presidential decree that creates the Truth Commission is based on the Organic Law of the Federal Public Administration; distant order, different and alien to the criminal powers established in the Constitution and its secondary laws.
Basically, the decree that creates the Truth Commission for the case of “The 43”, violates the Constitution since the president assumes powers of the Constituent Congress -creates laws in an illegal way–, for which it follows that such a Truth Commission is not the authority nor is it a competent court to modify the Historical Truth of Jesús Murillo.
Furthermore, Article 16 of the Constitution establishes the principle of legality; which orders: “The authorities can only do what the law expressly empowers them.”
Therefore, the presidential decree that creates the Truth Commission has a serious vice of origin and, consequently, all the acts derived from said Truth Commission are null and void.
This confirms that Jesús Murillo is in prison for an illegal and capricious tampering with the law and the Constitution.
But neither does the pigman end there.
After imprisoning Murillo illegally, a judge determined informal preventive detention, as allegedly responsible for the crime of “forced disappearance.”
But what do you think?
That when Jesús Murillo was head of the PGR and when he resolved the “Historical Truth” of the “Los 43” case, there was no definition of the “crime of forced disappearance.”
And if we appeal to Article 14 of the Constitution, it turns out that: “No law shall be retroactive to the detriment of any person.”
That is to say, a new violation of the Constitution in AMLO’s revenge against Murillo Karam.
Finally, Murillo is accused of the “crime of torture”, with the “tacky” argument that the acts of his subordinates –the alleged torture– transcend the accused, the former head of the PGR.
No, Mr. López Obrador, we are not “attacking” anyone here, we are only documenting, with hard data, the “historical swineherd” to whom you resorted to keep Jesús Murillo as a political prisoner; a revenge that should merit a Political Trial against President López Obrador.
At the time
#historical #truth #AMLOs #legal #swineherd