First modification:
Just over a week ago the war broke out in Ukraine after the invasion ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin. And while Moscow promoted the offensive as a form of “demilitarization and denazification” of Ukraine, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has used a speech of unity to fight the invader. The media war and the differences in narratives in this conflict is the subject that we analyze in this edition of El Debate.
Since long before the start of the war, the Kremlin’s speech has struck a chord in Russian history to justify the invasion of Ukraine, called in Russia as “a special military operation”. From this point of view, Putin conveyed the idea that he would go to liberate Ukraine, in order to “demilitarize and denazify it”, after speaking of “genocide” in this territory.
On the other hand, the Ukrainian speech has been a call for unity, for the need to fight the invader and be on a level with the members of the European Union, whom he asked for help. Many have indicated that the official Ukrainian discourse, the handling of information and networks, as well as the circumstances, have catapulted the image of the Ukrainian president to the level of a national hero, respected in the West.
How much truth is there in what the Ukrainian media exposes and in the official discourse? How much has the discourse of “genocide” and historical facts served to carry out the war? How much of the Russian or Ukrainian narrative has the West bought? We address these questions from the hand of our guests:
– Sonia Herrera Sánchez, PhD in Audiovisual Communication and specialist in feminist studies and peace journalism.
– Javier Bernabé Fraguas, doctor in International Relations, specialist in international information and communication and in crisis and conflict communication.
First modification:
Just over a week ago the war broke out in Ukraine after the invasion ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin. And while Moscow promoted the offensive as a form of “demilitarization and denazification” of Ukraine, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has used a speech of unity to fight the invader. The media war and the differences in narratives in this conflict is the subject that we analyze in this edition of El Debate.
Since long before the start of the war, the Kremlin’s speech has struck a chord in Russian history to justify the invasion of Ukraine, called in Russia as “a special military operation”. From this point of view, Putin conveyed the idea that he would go to liberate Ukraine, in order to “demilitarize and denazify it”, after speaking of “genocide” in this territory.
On the other hand, the Ukrainian speech has been a call for unity, for the need to fight the invader and be on a level with the members of the European Union, whom he asked for help. Many have indicated that the official Ukrainian discourse, the handling of information and networks, as well as the circumstances, have catapulted the image of the Ukrainian president to the level of a national hero, respected in the West.
How much truth is there in what the Ukrainian media exposes and in the official discourse? How much has the discourse of “genocide” and historical facts served to carry out the war? How much of the Russian or Ukrainian narrative has the West bought? We address these questions from the hand of our guests:
– Sonia Herrera Sánchez, PhD in Audiovisual Communication and specialist in feminist studies and peace journalism.
– Javier Bernabé Fraguas, doctor in International Relations, specialist in international information and communication and in crisis and conflict communication.
First modification:
Just over a week ago the war broke out in Ukraine after the invasion ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin. And while Moscow promoted the offensive as a form of “demilitarization and denazification” of Ukraine, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has used a speech of unity to fight the invader. The media war and the differences in narratives in this conflict is the subject that we analyze in this edition of El Debate.
Since long before the start of the war, the Kremlin’s speech has struck a chord in Russian history to justify the invasion of Ukraine, called in Russia as “a special military operation”. From this point of view, Putin conveyed the idea that he would go to liberate Ukraine, in order to “demilitarize and denazify it”, after speaking of “genocide” in this territory.
On the other hand, the Ukrainian speech has been a call for unity, for the need to fight the invader and be on a level with the members of the European Union, whom he asked for help. Many have indicated that the official Ukrainian discourse, the handling of information and networks, as well as the circumstances, have catapulted the image of the Ukrainian president to the level of a national hero, respected in the West.
How much truth is there in what the Ukrainian media exposes and in the official discourse? How much has the discourse of “genocide” and historical facts served to carry out the war? How much of the Russian or Ukrainian narrative has the West bought? We address these questions from the hand of our guests:
– Sonia Herrera Sánchez, PhD in Audiovisual Communication and specialist in feminist studies and peace journalism.
– Javier Bernabé Fraguas, doctor in International Relations, specialist in international information and communication and in crisis and conflict communication.
First modification:
Just over a week ago the war broke out in Ukraine after the invasion ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin. And while Moscow promoted the offensive as a form of “demilitarization and denazification” of Ukraine, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has used a speech of unity to fight the invader. The media war and the differences in narratives in this conflict is the subject that we analyze in this edition of El Debate.
Since long before the start of the war, the Kremlin’s speech has struck a chord in Russian history to justify the invasion of Ukraine, called in Russia as “a special military operation”. From this point of view, Putin conveyed the idea that he would go to liberate Ukraine, in order to “demilitarize and denazify it”, after speaking of “genocide” in this territory.
On the other hand, the Ukrainian speech has been a call for unity, for the need to fight the invader and be on a level with the members of the European Union, whom he asked for help. Many have indicated that the official Ukrainian discourse, the handling of information and networks, as well as the circumstances, have catapulted the image of the Ukrainian president to the level of a national hero, respected in the West.
How much truth is there in what the Ukrainian media exposes and in the official discourse? How much has the discourse of “genocide” and historical facts served to carry out the war? How much of the Russian or Ukrainian narrative has the West bought? We address these questions from the hand of our guests:
– Sonia Herrera Sánchez, PhD in Audiovisual Communication and specialist in feminist studies and peace journalism.
– Javier Bernabé Fraguas, doctor in International Relations, specialist in international information and communication and in crisis and conflict communication.
