After being attacked for what seemed to the public an ostentation of wealth, Sonia Bruganelli decided to defend herself from the criticisms of the private plane, explaining how the choice of the particular means of transport was also dictated by the needs of her daughter Silvia.
Some time ago Sonia Bruganelli had raised a big fuss because of a video in which he resumed Gabriele Parpiglia on his private plane, “Teasing him” for his own astonishment in the face of the situation and in particular the rich lunch.
The woman, in fact, had been accused to be snooty and wanting flaunt his wealth and so thousands of comments had popped up on his profile, in which the companion of Bonolis it really was attached.
Stove of many controversies, so, the woman wanted to explain herself followers why she and her family chose this type of medium. In fact, it seems that the reasons are linked to the daughter Silvia and his disease, which makes most of them difficult small movements.
Read also: Paolo Bonolis: Sonia Bruganelli humiliates a follower
Sonia Bruganelli: the private plane is for Silvia
“When there ‘incognite’ for the private plane know that it is also a way to be able to make life easier to Silvia. Who among you would not do it if you could ?????? “.
he wrote in these hours Sonia Bruganelli on social media, posting one click where you see his eldest daughter while being helped to get on the plane.
There 18 years old, in fact, it has a number of physical problems that prevent her from live a normal life and that they arrived due to a delay in development that has accompanied it since birth.
Thus, under the post, several comments by support And affection towards the girl and among these there is also that of Tommaso Zorzi, which is really related to Silvia.
“I have lived up close and I know commitment that you take for shorten the distance between Silvia and everyday life. And whoever does it, regardless of the means, deserves respect. Say hello to my Silvietta ”.
wrote the winner of the latest edition of Big Brother Vip. What do you think, in this case the end justifies the means?