Royal The Guardian: British Prince Charles pressured ministers to change the bill

Britannian heir to the crown prince Charles has put pressure on ministers to turn the bill into its own favor, the British newspaper says The Guardian.

Documents found in the National Archives show how the then prime minister John Majorin the ministers in the government agreed to the prince’s demands. Ministers gave up because they were concerned about the constitutional crisis that could have arisen if Charles’ demands had not been heeded.

Charles has thus, according to The Guardian, forced the elected government to act in a certain way.

Particular the Bill on Leasing and Tenants ‘Right to Purchase Residential Property was amended to exclude some of Charles’ premises. The Windsor family has used the ancient Queen’s consent process in England in at least four tenancy bills since the 1960s, according to The Guardian.

According to the procedure, the queen With Elizabeth II and his son Charles has the right to see in advance bills that affect their personal property or public authority.

Representatives of the Queen have previously refused to say how many times the monarch has called for changes to the bills. According to them, it is also a ‘purely formal’ procedure.

Read more: The Guardian: Queen Elizabeth has “almost certainly” secretly turned bills in her favor

Prince In 1992, Charles paid special attention to the small village of Newton St Loe, which is part of the Duchy of Cornwall’s premises of over £ 1 billion (approximately € 1.2 billion). He wanted the village to be excluded from the rental law.

The prince feared that the new law would also give his tenants the right to purchase and develop the historic properties they rented without worrying about their “special look”. The granting of the exemption has, according to The Guardian, resulted in a small proportion of the residents of the village of Newton St Loe suffering financially.

“It’s about total injustice and medievalism. Because my house is owned by someone infinitely rich and influential, I am not protected by the same laws that apply to everyone else in this country. There is nothing I can do about it, ”said the villager Jane Giddins.

According to Giddins, she and her husband can no longer use their property as loan collateral so they can pay for their health care expenses in the future.