Today, the day after the electoral defeat, opinion is mounting on the need to disintermediate with respect to the party currents, increasingly reduced to mere chains of power. Until yesterday the temptation to emancipate oneself from certain logics was always dampened and dormant by the expectation of recognition from an unhealthy system that has characterized the party and which still wants to resist taking responsibility for the defeat and for having made a community retreat politics both in terms of participation and on flattening out positions of aseptic governance. We can say that we were right, that a certain system had to be rejected and fought from the very beginning. He succumbed to the flattery of a few, allowing a modus operandi to be perpetrated. Our association has maintained a coherent position by signaling on several occasions that the absence of a leap from our generation inside and outside the party would have led to having to deal with the post-elections. Who for consistency who for necessity today find themselves converging, but credibility is not a habit that changes according to the political season.
A party that has not built a solid alliance with associations, ignoring the requests coming from organized groups in society. A party that is endowed with plethoric and plebiscitary bodies, mostly nominated than elected by members. A party that has not moved internal theses and alternative visions of society but unanimously hired secretaries to preserve the underlying supply chains of co-opts. A saturated symbol that in places of inequality is now repulsive. But above all the non-democratic methods of defining the political line from the territories to the national, corroded by an audience of members often polluted by patronage methods. The young people themselves have often been conniving with these dynamics, net of a few virtuous realities, fragmented for the territories without a single voice that kept their back straight in the face of all this, preserving only individual destinies rather than carrying out a free and collective project. A project that our generation expected, which has not been able to intercept and represent. The Secretary Enrico Letta, entangled in a network of corrective elitisms, did what he could to free himself, certainly misreading the alliances in an electoral key, but far be it from us to attribute all the responsibilities to him, which others have not looked forward to. to put on.
Today, a change of the guard of a new secretary is not enough, a new management team is needed. The risk that a political class overtaken by events wants to continue to manage and act as a bridge between the constituent phase and the congress phase is just around the corner. All this had to change already, we are here on the same side, today as yesterday to reiterate it forcefully. It is essential that young people organize themselves in a free zone to exert pressure on a party that does not really want to change and be the driving force for those who today are tempted by restyling operations alone to leave everything unchanged.
InOltre Progressive Alternative
#InOltre #Progressive #Alternative #currents