Orsini, Travaglio, Santoro, who are the “Guerrapiattisti”: the aedi of critical thinking that clash with the dominant one
Meanwhile, let’s say it right away, in maiestatis: the title joke is not ours, we have “arrrubbbata dal UEBBBE” and we ignore its minting, but it is remarkable. But who are the “Warpiattisti“? THE Labori Santorothe Orsini and the many other aedi of (sacrosanct) critical thought are today pointed out as enemies of the dominant thought, which sees the extreme simplification with the equation invader = guilty + defender = saint.
Well yes, the war forces one to simple ideas (often wrong) and certainly to option one of the sides, including neutrality. But really i pacifists they are all poseurs or fools who do not grasp the elementary concept of right to defense (armed) of the attacked against the aggressor? Well in fact just opens his mouth a pacifist we usually hear him profess his version of the world which is, more or less variably, the following:
TO) I repudiate the war tout court, at the cost of death (usually others, but also mine, and others who maybe want to defend themselves after all who cares)
B) I admit self-defense but not with weapons (with spitting and cursing or at most with blows with cups, but without the nail on top)
C) I admit legitimate defense, even armed but only in theory, because the weapons of dialogue and diplomacy must prevail (in the meantime, therefore, no weapons to those who defend themselves, make do with what they have in the pantry or in the fridge, at most we send them cans of tuna; once empty he can also throw them at tanksalways cursing like a Turk, that yes).
#Orsini #Travaglio #Santoro #Guerrapiattisti