A Gulf man filed a lawsuit against another Gulf national, in which he stated that he deliberately rammed his dog, which led to him having fractures and damage to the lung, and inflicting moral damage on him as a result of the psychological pain he felt due to his strong attachment to his dog and depriving him of it, and demanded to oblige the defendant to pay him 30 thousand dirhams in compensation for The material and moral damages sustained by him and his dog, with a legal interest of 9%, and a partial civil court in Ras Al Khaimah, obligating the defendant to pay him 16,664 dirhams, in compensation for the material and moral damage incurred, with legal benefits of 6% from the date of the judgment becoming.
In detail, the defendant denied deliberately running over the plaintiff’s dog, explaining that the dog was walking on the street unaccompanied and endangered his life, and his speed was slow when the run-down process occurred. The defendant was walking against the road and deliberately ran over the dog, and he has a bill for the purchase of the dog from the previous owner who was with him when treating the dog at the animal care center.
The defendant’s attorney, Lawyer Mohamed Abdel Azim, requested that the case not be accepted for filing it without a capacity, and that the plaintiff be obligated to pay fees, expenses and attorney’s fees, while the plaintiff submitted an animal passport proving his ownership of the dog and its type and a contract of waiver and sale of the dog from its previous owner. By obligating the defendant to pay his client 30 thousand dirhams in compensation for the material and moral damages he and his dog sustained, with a legal interest of 9%.
In the operative part of the civil court arbitrator, it was stated that the defense raised by the defendant that the plaintiff does not own the dog, the Civil Procedure Code stipulates that he does not accept any request or payment in which the owner does not have an existing and legitimate interest, and yet the potential interest is sufficient if the purpose of the request Precaution to ward off imminent harm or ascertain a right that is feared will be lost when a dispute over it.
She added that the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant stating that the latter ran over the dog with his car and inflicted bodily damage and fractures, and the medical report states that the dog suffers from pneumothorax, lung congestion and rib fractures. The plaintiff suffered as a result of the physical injuries inflicted on his dog, represented by the expenses of treatment and follow-up of his health condition and the expenses of purchasing medicines according to what is fixed in the invoices, which is estimated at 11 thousand 646 dirhams, which is the amount that the court deems sufficient for the material compensation.
She stated that there is no doubt that the plaintiff’s dog is a pet and of a good breed and that he was subjected to physical injuries that left him with fractures, which had a great impact on the plaintiff’s psyche because of the sadness he felt as a result of his dog’s injury, and the court considers that his request for compensation for the moral damage he sustained It obligates the defendant to pay the plaintiff 5000 dirhams in compensation for moral damage, and legal interest at the rate of 6% from the date of the judgment rendering until full payment, and obligates him to pay the lawsuit expenses.
A Gulf man filed a lawsuit against another Gulf national, in which he stated that he deliberately rammed his dog, which led to him having fractures and damage to the lung, and inflicting moral damage on him as a result of the psychological pain he felt due to his strong attachment to his dog and depriving him of it, and demanded to oblige the defendant to pay him 30 thousand dirhams in compensation for The material and moral damages sustained by him and his dog, with a legal interest of 9%, and a partial civil court in Ras Al Khaimah, obligating the defendant to pay him 16,664 dirhams, in compensation for the material and moral damage incurred, with legal benefits of 6% from the date of the judgment becoming.
In detail, the defendant denied deliberately running over the plaintiff’s dog, explaining that the dog was walking on the street unaccompanied and endangered his life, and his speed was slow when the run-down process occurred. The defendant was walking against the road and deliberately ran over the dog, and he has a bill for the purchase of the dog from the previous owner who was with him when treating the dog at the animal care center.
The defendant’s attorney, Lawyer Mohamed Abdel Azim, requested that the case not be accepted for filing it without a capacity, and that the plaintiff be obligated to pay fees, expenses and attorney’s fees, while the plaintiff submitted an animal passport proving his ownership of the dog and its type and a contract of waiver and sale of the dog from its previous owner. By obligating the defendant to pay his client 30 thousand dirhams in compensation for the material and moral damages he and his dog sustained, with a legal interest of 9%.
In the operative part of the civil court arbitrator, it was stated that the defense raised by the defendant that the plaintiff does not own the dog, the Civil Procedure Code stipulates that he does not accept any request or payment in which the owner does not have an existing and legitimate interest, and yet the potential interest is sufficient if the purpose of the request Precaution to ward off imminent harm or ascertain a right that is feared will be lost when a dispute over it.
She added that the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant stating that the latter ran over the dog with his car and inflicted bodily damage and fractures, and the medical report states that the dog suffers from pneumothorax, lung congestion and rib fractures. The plaintiff suffered as a result of the physical injuries inflicted on his dog, represented by the expenses of treatment and follow-up of his health condition and the expenses of purchasing medicines according to what is fixed in the invoices, which is estimated at 11 thousand 646 dirhams, which is the amount that the court deems sufficient for the material compensation.
She stated that there is no doubt that the plaintiff’s dog is a pet and of a good breed and that he was subjected to physical injuries that left him with fractures, which had a great impact on the plaintiff’s psyche because of the sadness he felt as a result of his dog’s injury, and the court considers that his request for compensation for the moral damage he sustained It obligates the defendant to pay the plaintiff 5000 dirhams in compensation for moral damage, and legal interest at the rate of 6% from the date of the judgment rendering until full payment, and obligates him to pay the lawsuit expenses.
A Gulf man filed a lawsuit against another Gulf national, in which he stated that he deliberately rammed his dog, which led to him having fractures and damage to the lung, and inflicting moral damage on him as a result of the psychological pain he felt due to his strong attachment to his dog and depriving him of it, and demanded to oblige the defendant to pay him 30 thousand dirhams in compensation for The material and moral damages sustained by him and his dog, with a legal interest of 9%, and a partial civil court in Ras Al Khaimah, obligating the defendant to pay him 16,664 dirhams, in compensation for the material and moral damage incurred, with legal benefits of 6% from the date of the judgment becoming.
In detail, the defendant denied deliberately running over the plaintiff’s dog, explaining that the dog was walking on the street unaccompanied and endangered his life, and his speed was slow when the run-down process occurred. The defendant was walking against the road and deliberately ran over the dog, and he has a bill for the purchase of the dog from the previous owner who was with him when treating the dog at the animal care center.
The defendant’s attorney, Lawyer Mohamed Abdel Azim, requested that the case not be accepted for filing it without a capacity, and that the plaintiff be obligated to pay fees, expenses and attorney’s fees, while the plaintiff submitted an animal passport proving his ownership of the dog and its type and a contract of waiver and sale of the dog from its previous owner. By obligating the defendant to pay his client 30 thousand dirhams in compensation for the material and moral damages he and his dog sustained, with a legal interest of 9%.
In the operative part of the civil court arbitrator, it was stated that the defense raised by the defendant that the plaintiff does not own the dog, the Civil Procedure Code stipulates that he does not accept any request or payment in which the owner does not have an existing and legitimate interest, and yet the potential interest is sufficient if the purpose of the request Precaution to ward off imminent harm or ascertain a right that is feared will be lost when a dispute over it.
She added that the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant stating that the latter ran over the dog with his car and inflicted bodily damage and fractures, and the medical report states that the dog suffers from pneumothorax, lung congestion and rib fractures. The plaintiff suffered as a result of the physical injuries inflicted on his dog, represented by the expenses of treatment and follow-up of his health condition and the expenses of purchasing medicines according to what is fixed in the invoices, which is estimated at 11 thousand 646 dirhams, which is the amount that the court deems sufficient for the material compensation.
She stated that there is no doubt that the plaintiff’s dog is a pet and of a good breed and that he was subjected to physical injuries that left him with fractures, which had a great impact on the plaintiff’s psyche because of the sadness he felt as a result of his dog’s injury, and the court considers that his request for compensation for the moral damage he sustained It obligates the defendant to pay the plaintiff 5000 dirhams in compensation for moral damage, and legal interest at the rate of 6% from the date of the judgment rendering until full payment, and obligates him to pay the lawsuit expenses.
A Gulf man filed a lawsuit against another Gulf national, in which he stated that he deliberately rammed his dog, which led to him having fractures and damage to the lung, and inflicting moral damage on him as a result of the psychological pain he felt due to his strong attachment to his dog and depriving him of it, and demanded to oblige the defendant to pay him 30 thousand dirhams in compensation for The material and moral damages sustained by him and his dog, with a legal interest of 9%, and a partial civil court in Ras Al Khaimah, obligating the defendant to pay him 16,664 dirhams, in compensation for the material and moral damage incurred, with legal benefits of 6% from the date of the judgment becoming.
In detail, the defendant denied deliberately running over the plaintiff’s dog, explaining that the dog was walking on the street unaccompanied and endangered his life, and his speed was slow when the run-down process occurred. The defendant was walking against the road and deliberately ran over the dog, and he has a bill for the purchase of the dog from the previous owner who was with him when treating the dog at the animal care center.
The defendant’s attorney, Lawyer Mohamed Abdel Azim, requested that the case not be accepted for filing it without a capacity, and that the plaintiff be obligated to pay fees, expenses and attorney’s fees, while the plaintiff submitted an animal passport proving his ownership of the dog and its type and a contract of waiver and sale of the dog from its previous owner. By obligating the defendant to pay his client 30 thousand dirhams in compensation for the material and moral damages he and his dog sustained, with a legal interest of 9%.
In the operative part of the civil court arbitrator, it was stated that the defense raised by the defendant that the plaintiff does not own the dog, the Civil Procedure Code stipulates that he does not accept any request or payment in which the owner does not have an existing and legitimate interest, and yet the potential interest is sufficient if the purpose of the request Precaution to ward off imminent harm or ascertain a right that is feared will be lost when a dispute over it.
She added that the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant stating that the latter ran over the dog with his car and inflicted bodily damage and fractures, and the medical report states that the dog suffers from pneumothorax, lung congestion and rib fractures. The plaintiff suffered as a result of the physical injuries inflicted on his dog, represented by the expenses of treatment and follow-up of his health condition and the expenses of purchasing medicines according to what is fixed in the invoices, which is estimated at 11 thousand 646 dirhams, which is the amount that the court deems sufficient for the material compensation.
She stated that there is no doubt that the plaintiff’s dog is a pet and of a good breed and that he was subjected to physical injuries that left him with fractures, which had a great impact on the plaintiff’s psyche because of the sadness he felt as a result of his dog’s injury, and the court considers that his request for compensation for the moral damage he sustained It obligates the defendant to pay the plaintiff 5000 dirhams in compensation for moral damage, and legal interest at the rate of 6% from the date of the judgment rendering until full payment, and obligates him to pay the lawsuit expenses.