Al Ain Court of First Instance ruled that a worker in a shop detailing curtains must pay an amount of 9,000 dirhams to a customer, in addition to obligating him to pay judicial fees and expenses, against the background of the defendant receiving 8000 dirhams from the plaintiff, as a deposit to make curtains for his residence, and he did not commit to implementing the agreement or refunding the amount.
In the details, the owner of a villa filed a lawsuit in which he demanded to compel a worker in a shop detailing curtains to pay 13,000 dirhams, for breaching the agreed obligations, indicating that he agreed with the defendant to install curtains, and paid him 8000 dirhams as a deposit, and he did not install the curtains or refund the amount. , despite the passage of about two months since the agreement.
The plaintiff submitted to the court a document for his claim, a copy of a receipt voucher, and a copy of a tax invoice, and by asking the defendant, through the video calling service (remotely), he admitted his preoccupation with an amount of 8000 dirhams.
The court stated in the merits of the judgment that the defendant admitted that his debt was occupied with the amount in question, which amounted to 8000 dirhams, the value of the amount received from the plaintiff, and that he had not fulfilled his obligation.
The court indicated that it was proven that the defendant had failed to implement his obligation to fulfill the amount owed by him, which would lead to an error necessitating liability in his right. For all damages, the court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff 9,000 dirhams, in addition to obligating him to pay judicial fees and expenses.
Al Ain Court of First Instance ruled that a worker in a shop detailing curtains must pay an amount of 9,000 dirhams to a customer, in addition to obligating him to pay judicial fees and expenses, against the background of the defendant receiving 8000 dirhams from the plaintiff, as a deposit to make curtains for his residence, and he did not commit to implementing the agreement or refunding the amount.
In the details, the owner of a villa filed a lawsuit in which he demanded to compel a worker in a shop detailing curtains to pay 13,000 dirhams, for breaching the agreed obligations, indicating that he agreed with the defendant to install curtains, and paid him 8000 dirhams as a deposit, and he did not install the curtains or refund the amount. , despite the passage of about two months since the agreement.
The plaintiff submitted to the court a document for his claim, a copy of a receipt voucher, and a copy of a tax invoice, and by asking the defendant, through the video calling service (remotely), he admitted his preoccupation with an amount of 8000 dirhams.
The court stated in the merits of the judgment that the defendant admitted that his debt was occupied with the amount in question, which amounted to 8000 dirhams, the value of the amount received from the plaintiff, and that he had not fulfilled his obligation.
The court indicated that it was proven that the defendant had failed to implement his obligation to fulfill the amount owed by him, which would lead to an error necessitating liability in his right. For all damages, the court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff 9,000 dirhams, in addition to obligating him to pay judicial fees and expenses.
Al Ain Court of First Instance ruled that a worker in a shop detailing curtains must pay an amount of 9,000 dirhams to a customer, in addition to obligating him to pay judicial fees and expenses, against the background of the defendant receiving 8000 dirhams from the plaintiff, as a deposit to make curtains for his residence, and he did not commit to implementing the agreement or refunding the amount.
In the details, the owner of a villa filed a lawsuit in which he demanded to compel a worker in a shop detailing curtains to pay 13,000 dirhams, for breaching the agreed obligations, indicating that he agreed with the defendant to install curtains, and paid him 8000 dirhams as a deposit, and he did not install the curtains or refund the amount. , despite the passage of about two months since the agreement.
The plaintiff submitted to the court a document for his claim, a copy of a receipt voucher, and a copy of a tax invoice, and by asking the defendant, through the video calling service (remotely), he admitted his preoccupation with an amount of 8000 dirhams.
The court stated in the merits of the judgment that the defendant admitted that his debt was occupied with the amount in question, which amounted to 8000 dirhams, the value of the amount received from the plaintiff, and that he had not fulfilled his obligation.
The court indicated that it was proven that the defendant had failed to implement his obligation to fulfill the amount owed by him, which would lead to an error necessitating liability in his right. For all damages, the court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff 9,000 dirhams, in addition to obligating him to pay judicial fees and expenses.
Al Ain Court of First Instance ruled that a worker in a shop detailing curtains must pay an amount of 9,000 dirhams to a customer, in addition to obligating him to pay judicial fees and expenses, against the background of the defendant receiving 8000 dirhams from the plaintiff, as a deposit to make curtains for his residence, and he did not commit to implementing the agreement or refunding the amount.
In the details, the owner of a villa filed a lawsuit in which he demanded to compel a worker in a shop detailing curtains to pay 13,000 dirhams, for breaching the agreed obligations, indicating that he agreed with the defendant to install curtains, and paid him 8000 dirhams as a deposit, and he did not install the curtains or refund the amount. , despite the passage of about two months since the agreement.
The plaintiff submitted to the court a document for his claim, a copy of a receipt voucher, and a copy of a tax invoice, and by asking the defendant, through the video calling service (remotely), he admitted his preoccupation with an amount of 8000 dirhams.
The court stated in the merits of the judgment that the defendant admitted that his debt was occupied with the amount in question, which amounted to 8000 dirhams, the value of the amount received from the plaintiff, and that he had not fulfilled his obligation.
The court indicated that it was proven that the defendant had failed to implement his obligation to fulfill the amount owed by him, which would lead to an error necessitating liability in his right. For all damages, the court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff 9,000 dirhams, in addition to obligating him to pay judicial fees and expenses.