On September 9, 2024, the Spanish-Venezuelan lawyer Efraín Jorge Acevedo published the book entitled “Nilson Domínguez Sancho Arrieta case: audios, lies and money“.
According to the criteria of
This book, by 75 pagesfocuses on a series of events and controversies surrounding the case of Daniel Sanchowho was sentenced in the first instance at the end of August to life imprisonment for the premeditated murder of Edwin Arrieta the 44-year-old Colombian surgeon, in Thailand.
The ruling has generated a great deal of debate and speculation, especially around the evidence and testimonies that have been presented during the trial.
The case has been engulfed in a series of additional complications due to a parallel plot that has emerged in relation to some audio recordings. According to the accusations, Rodolfo Sanchothe father of Daniel Sanchowould have tried to bribe Nilson Domingueza key witness in the trial, so that testify in favor of his son.
According to the Spanish media Lecturas, Nilson Domínguez had a relationship with Arrieta in the past. For this reason, according to this media outlet that has closely followed the case in Thailand, Daniel Sancho’s defense would have tried to get Domínguez to testify in favor of the Spanish chef as part of the strategy in the trial, something that ultimately never happened.
However, accusations are now being raised as to whether it was a bribe by the Sanchos or extortion plotted by Domínguez, something that is still under investigation.
These accusations are based on a series of audios which, it is claimed, would prove that Sancho offered Dominguez money to provide favorable testimony.
Dominguez’s lawyerMilenyi Gonzalezmade these accusations public in an interview on the Spanish program ‘Código 10’, broadcast on the channel ‘Cuatro’, where he assured that he had all the documentation necessary to demonstrate that Sancho tried to manipulate the witness’s testimony.
I just want to clear my name, because I have been treated like an extortionist.
In the midst of this controversy, the media Readings has had the opportunity to talk exclusively with Nilson Dominguez to obtain his version of the facts and clarify the numerous doubts and accusations that have arisen around his testimony.
In which Dominguez has expressed his deep frustration and concern about the extortion allegations that have been made against him, as well as the constant doubt surrounding his complaint in Venezuela.
“I just want to clear my name, because I have been treated like an extortionist,” Dominguez said.
Dominguez has stressed that his complaint in Venezuela is legitimate and supported by solid evidence. According to him, documentary evidence and messaging that supports his version of events and demonstrates that he has not been part of any extortion scheme.
In addition, there has responded to the claims that her testimony is false or manipulated, insisting that her complaint is not related to sexual harassment, but to threats she has received.
Between the audios and Nilson Domínguez’s money
One of the most controversial aspects of the case is the first contact between Rodolfo Sancho’s defense team and Nilson Domínguez. Domínguez has insisted that he was contacted by Ramón Chipirrás, a member of the defense team, on October 9, 2023, at 10 am Venezuelan time.
This statement has been a point of contention, as some previous versions indicated that Domínguez had sought out Sancho’s team. Dominguez has denied these versions and has provided specific details about the initial contact, including date and time, so that this information can be verified.
The book of Efrain Jorge Acevedo It addresses in depth the accusations of manipulation and alleged money payments, as well as the veracity of the audios published on the YouTube channel of Laura Rodriguez.
It must be said that Nilson does not speak without prior payment, so Lecturas will have paid him
These audios have been presented as evidence that Sancho offered money to Dominguez. However, the authenticity of these audios are still under investigationand it has not been confirmed whether they have been manipulated or whether they reflect the reality of the conversations between Sancho and Dominguez.
The same day the exclusive statements were published, Dareol Rewind’s YouTube channel dropped the possibility that Nilson would have received a sum of money for the interview conducted by Lecturas: “It must be said that Nilson does not speak without prior payment, so Lecturas will have paid him. I don’t know the amount, but he has 3,000 euros in mind. I don’t know if we will ever know, but I can tell you that he has that fee in mind, because in the end when we went to ask him, he gave us that figure.”
These rumors have been denied by Lecturas, which reaffirms its commitment to truthfulness and transparency in covering this case.
The publication of these exclusive statements seeks to clarify the situation and provide an accurate view of the events and allegations surrounding the case of Daniel Sancho.
The controversy surrounding the case continues to be a topic of great interest and discussion. While Daniel Sancho awaits the appeal of his conviction, the debate over the influence of the audios and the veracity of the testimony of Nilson Domínguez remains a focal point of media coverage.
#Nilson #Domínguez #accused #witness #bought #Rodolfo #Sancho #case #murder #Edwin #Arrieta #breaks #silence