Actress Elisa Mouliaá has attended the requirement of Judge Adolfo Carretero and has contributed the contact and names of the two organizers of the party where, as reported last October, the export of adding Iñigo Errejón sexually assault her.
Although in the initial complaint he identified these two people, when the instructor agreed to provide the names and telephone numbers of all those attending that party only provided that of three individuals, claiming that they were the “only ones he knows.”
Errejón’s defense then claimed the complete identification and the judge transferred him in the form of a demand to the defense of Mouliaá in a providence that required “all the data you have” or that allow the identification of the organizers of the party.
The following has been the actress’s lawyer’s response explaining that the beginning was not contributed “because both live in Australia and cannot go to this judicial headquarters in order to give a statement” and a “video call would be difficult to carry out the hourly difference ». It contributes the names and numbers to be the investigating judge “who finally decides on relevance.”
It is the mood for the practice of the evidence between accusation and defense in this procedure. Both parties had a deadline to request what they considered convenient and the judge issued a car, as ABC reported, agreeing everything they expected to contribute.
In the case of Mouliaá, for example, he accepted that he required to add the internal research they had carried out on the behavior of Íñigo Errejón. As for what the politician’s defense asked, the obligation of the actress to prove everything she has billed on television since she filed the complaint for sexual assault.
“Sensational and biased” information
At that crossing of requests, the instructor required Mouliaá for his psychiatric history and now, his defense has opposed, because he considers that with the psychological report and the psychiatric report that they have already announced that they will deliver and that it will be carried out as an expert opinion within the maximum period One month, it’s enough. They understand that presenting the entire mental health history of the actress would put her right to privacy in check.
They have also opposed the incorporation of publications in the media with statements from Mouliaá on this matter that Errejón was going to contribute, qualifying the same as “sensational and biased” and emphasizing that “they lack probative effectiveness and will not link the judge ». “Informative sensationalism is an obvious and present journalistic phenomenon in any field and specifically, in the press releases accompanied to the process,” he says.
Along the same lines, they reject that the file of the archived cause against the ex -husband of Mouliaá is contributed by The Court of Violence on Women Number 3 of Madrid for reasons for “data protection of third parties”, although these proceedings have already been required for their consideration. The judge will now decide if he leaves them out.
#Mouliaá #identifies #organizers #party #judge #demanded
