Media | The British newspaper was convicted of violating Meghan Markle’s privacy, with a fine of one pound

Meghan Marklen and the years-long struggle of the British tabloid press has resulted in a decision at the turn of the year in at least one case.

In December, it was reported that Associated Newspapers, the publisher of Mail on Sunday, had lost a lawsuit against Markle. Mail on Sunday was found to have violated Markle’s privacy when it published Markle to his father Thomas Marklelle a private letter sent in August 2018.

Markle, who has appeared in public as an actor, has been the subject of a huge media spin in Britain since he began dating and later married a prince. Harry with.

The British tabloid press published several articles about Harry and Duchess Meghan, alleged gossip-based revelation stories, and the couple eventually declared a total ban on interviews with tabloid magazines.

Read more: Harry and Meghan declare a total ban on interviews with British tabloids and accuse them of lying – This is what can happen in an “open declaration of war” with the media

Since then, Harry and Meghan have moved to North America and left the British court.

Marklen and the case between Mail on Sunday has received a lot of attention in Britain in recent weeks.

Following the announcement of the verdict, the publisher of the magazine announced that he would take the case to the Supreme Court, but it has now emerged that it has reversed its decision.

The Guardian has published a news report today, based on the legal papers it has received, stating that Mail on Sunday has passed the verdict and is abandoning its intent to appeal to a higher court.

In the same the document shows the amount that the magazine has been ordered to pay for violating Markle’s privacy. That’s one pound (about 1.20 euros).

Nominal compensation does not automatically mean that Markle’s victory in court is questionable. For example The Daily Beast interviewed by a lawyer David Hooper estimates that Marklen should probably have had an even longer struggle with the newspaper publisher over the personal inconvenience caused to him by the publication of the letter.

Markle has also stated in public that he has not taken the case to court for money, but to get justice in the case.

The publisher of the magazine has also been ordered to pay a substantial sum of Markle’s legal costs, which The Guardian estimates could mean more than £ 1 million in costs. Similarly, the publisher has agreed to pay Marche compensation for copyright infringement related to the publication of the letter.

This amount has been kept secret, but Markle’s representative has described it as noticeable in public and announced that the money will be donated to charity.

Mail on Sunday also had to publish a notice on its front page saying it had lost the lawsuit to Markle. The newspaper did this on the day of the slaughter.

This is not to be missed as the final lawsuit between the Duchess and the British press.

Prince Harry has challenged Rupert Murdochin News UK and Daily Mirror publisher Reach sued for alleged telephone espionage. According to The Guardian, the case may come to court later this year.