Marching a case against the attorney general!

The obsession of the right to overthrow the Sánchez Government has reached delirium with the unprecedented decision of the Supreme Court to open a case against the State Attorney General. To reach this point, everyone who could do it has done it: the Popular Party, the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid, the “Illustrious” Bar Association of Madrid, the Presidency of the Community of Madrid, the Council of Prosecutors, several media and, as a cherry on top, the Supreme Court, specifically its Second Chamber, chaired by Judge Marchena, whom the PP intended to raise to the presidency of the court to control justice “through the back door”. And the institutions of the State? And the quality of democracy? Well, fuck them. Spain is sinking and the patriotic urgency is to throw out Sánchez.

I will not give a detailed portrait of this repugnant offensive. They are already doing it, with much more knowledge and depthmy colleagues from elDiario.es. I will limit myself to making a summary. This newspaper publishes exclusively that Alberto González Amador, Isabel Díaz Ayuso’s boyfriend, is being investigated for tax fraud and document falsification in relation to a mask business during the pandemic. The Chief of Staff of the Madrid president, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, reacts with a campaign of intoxication according to which the prosecutor in the case, Julián Salto Torres, has proposed to González Amador a conformity agreement so that the case does not go to court. but the agreement has been stopped “from above.” The message that Rodríguez intends to convey is simple: we are not facing a case of corruption but rather a political scandal whose objective is the destruction of Ayuso. To carry out his ploy, he sends The World, Digital Freedom, He Debate and Vozpópuli the copy of an email from prosecutor Salto to González Amador in which he tells him that the conformity agreement is possible. In reality, the request for the agreement did not come from the prosecutor, but from the fraudster, and the email is nothing more than a response to his request, but what does it matter: the four media outlets meekly publish that the prosecutor is the one who proposed the agreement and , except The Worldthey spread the hoax that it has been stopped from high places. In response to questions from journalists about this information, and to safeguard the name of the institution, the Prosecutor’s Office released a statement the next day in which it clarified that it was González Amador who requested the agreement of conformity.

#Marching #case #attorney #general

Next Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended