The sources explained to “Sky News Arabia”, that the leaders of these groups expressed their “dissatisfaction” with not taking a position against “Bashaga” and his new government, saying that they “will pay the price for holding the stick from the middle,” as they described it.
She pointed out that notables and personalities in the city asked “Bashaga” and “Al-Dabaiba” to spare Misurata the internal conflict between the many armed groups deployed in it, and “to get out of their differences from it”, but they did not prevent the two parties from conducting visits and meetings with them during the last period.
Those interested in Libyan affairs believe that many voices in Misrata sought to control the situation in the city; In order not to be a scene of confrontations, in light of the mobilization of groups from both sides, and it witnessed incidents that almost developed into open confrontations, especially when a pro-Dabaiba force kidnapped ministers within the new government formation of Bashagha, but the latter said that, ” End sedition” and avoid “recourse to arms.”
create conflict
The Libyan political researcher, Ezzedine Aqeel, said that these voices in Misurata will embroil the country in a conflict with ominous consequences, calling on the “good majority” in the city not to allow these people to ignite sedition, especially in light of the country’s widespread decline in various service, security and other fields. .
Aqeel stressed that these armed groups have torn the social fabric in Libya, fueled sedition and violence since 2014, and contributed to creating an atmosphere incubating terrorism and organized crime, and the increase in illegal immigration activity across the Libyan coast, while poverty and disease increased in the country.
refusing to line up
Since the beginning of the crisis, the people of Misurata issued a statement refusing to participate in any political alignment that splits the city’s ranks, and called on the outgoing government “not to export its problems to the street, and to try to incite people against each other, in order to continue in power.”
The statement criticized the leaders of the armed groups who promoted the rhetoric of “fighting and fighting” between the people of the same city, instead of “healing the rifts” and “extinguishing the fire of sedition”, blaming them for any lives lost in this conflict.
The Libyan political analyst, Faraj Zaidan, stated that it is not acceptable to continue leaving these groups, and that it is not acceptable for them to remain in an agreement or settlement on the pretext of achieving a political solution.
Zaidan stressed that modern Libya will not be built with rivalries that will only lead to more division, hatred and division, tearing society apart and blowing up any move to move to the desired state, calling for benefiting from the previous experiences of countries that have gone through a situation similar to the current Libyan reality, and have now become “successful and coherent nations.” .
#Libya #Militias #threaten #neutrals #dispute #Dabaiba #Bashagha